💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

FredS1 (Texas)
Posts: 1
Posted:
I am a board member for a medium sized condo complex in Austin, Texas. The management company we have hired, on a regular basis, refuses to follow the board members' instruction on some issues related to property rules/regulations and safety/crime issues. Policies are voted on by board members, approved by board members and then presented to the management company for enactment. None of the policies approved are unusual and are quite commonly seen in a condo community. The management company would either stall the policy or tried to make some oddball excuse on why they didn't enact the policy. Because of this non-action, the value of the property has been negatively affected... Should the HOA Board retain a real estate attorney or should the matter be forwarded to the Texas Real Estate Commission? Thank you!
WilliamT (Arizona)
Posts: 489
Posted:
Why not just interview new management companies?

Bill
BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
I am assuming you signed a contract with specific expectations and penalties for non-compliance. I would remind them of the contract and if they still don't live up to it do what Bill said and start interviewing new companies.
GeraldT1 (<Not Specified>)
Posts: 519
Posted:
Fred - Look at the MC contract, see if there are any loopholes as far as termination, build an association file of all contracts, contacts, resident addresses, etc. and then dump the MC. Gerald
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
I concur with all of the above except I would not contact an attorney unless the MC balked at terminating the contract or would not release the association records.
BarbaraR (Texas)
Posts: 1
Posted:
Fred,
I am here in Austin, Tx as well. Would love to know more regarding who the MC is etc, so we dont ever use them. Let's chat!
LuciusD
Posts: 139
Posted:
It's interesting everyone assumes the board knows what they are doing and the management company is "stonewalling". How about the possibility the board is over-reaching and the management company realizes they (the board) are "out to lunch" on some of their "policies".
In my opinion the board should engage the services of a competent attorney to review the policies they have enacted before they go about searching for a management company that will blindly carry out whatever they happen to cook up.
The management company may be saving the board from itself by not acting.
Just a contrary opinion.
JohnM3 (Florida)
Posts: 288
Posted:
Lucius: Understand something ;
1. The Board is the emploer
2. The MCis the employee.
3. The Board asks the questions if what they ask is legal. Then the answer to the MC is simple. YOUR FIRED PUNCH OUT AND LEAVE THE PREMISES>
MarieG (Florida)
Posts: 11
Posted:
It's so simple.....sit down with the owner of the company and give them one chance to rectify their behavior. Either do as the board requests or you're fired. I'm sure that you can cancel your contract for good reason. Please make sure to document everything.
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Lucius, I agree some Boards are "out to lunch". I have just had an experience with such a Board. As an outside expert helping a desparate homeowner, I tried to make them aware they were breaking laws, failing to notify members, lousy accounting, and atrocious (unrecognizable) minutes. Fortunately at a resolution meeting with the homeowner and me, they brought in an attorney and other "outside advisors". The Board didn't have a clue and without this intervention I think the Board would not have acted appropriately. This could have lead to an expensive court case where the Board members may have been found liable.

However Lucius, to present the other side I must say if this association had a MC this might not have happened.
LisaS (Illinois)
Posts: 341
Posted:
I agree with most of the comments.

Let me add though, that if the MC thought that the requests were illegal, ill-advised or otherwise a bad idea...then perhaps they should have simply said so. Delays and non-compliance with the requests of the Board members is bad enough. However, the lack of a plausible reason is much worse and really grounds for termination.

Most associations hire an MC so they don't have to continuously babysit and follow-up!

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here