šŸ’¬ Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚔ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

MichaelS56 (Minnesota)
Posts: 872
Posted:
Our Board is brainstorming ways to gain some level of control over the rising cost of the master insurance premium. Last year our insurance premium went up 29% and it is clear that our association is facing a serious potential financial problem. One topic of discussion has been removing building coverage responsibility from the association to the owner's full responsibility.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,115
Posted:
1. You likely need to amend the covenants to make that happen.

2. The owners currently have full responsibility for building coverage by paying assessments and having the Association purchase the coverage.

3. I doubt that the Association will lower the Assessment by the amount used to pay for that coverage. Expecting that the Association wouldn't consider that, the Board is effectively raising assessments anyway (because it would cost the member more than they are currently paying).

It sounds like the Board simply doesn't want to increase assessments to pay for the coverage so they consider transferring the responsibility (which really isn't a transfer of responsibility) to be able to say that they kept expenses low. It's a slight of hand type of trick that didn't change anything but might make the board look good.

Most likely, the Board will need to raise assessments to meet the new costs.
The board can minimize the increase by:
1) shopping around - I found insurance brokers obtaining better deals than simply going to the larger companies.
2) Increase deductible - just be sure to adopt a plan so the Association actually has the deductible available if needed.


I suggest that the following be done prior to making decisions.

1) determine what the amount would be per lot for the Association to pay the coverage.
2) Someone should contact their own agent and see what the amount would be to cover their unit on their own.
3) Determine the amount of the assessment that goes to pay the insurance.
4) Figure out the cost savings (if any) to the individual owner
5) Utilize these figures when making the decision.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 1,384
Posted:
-- What exactly do your COA's covenants say on the subject of insuring the buildings?

-- Has your board reviewed this section of the Minnesota Condo Act https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/515A.3-112 ? So far it seems to me the latter statute sections greatly limits what your COA can do.
JeffT2 (Iowa)
Posts: 896
Posted:
I wrote a response and had AI rewrite and add points. Here it is:

Don't Just Shop for a Lower Premium—Reduce Your Risk

I'm assuming you are a condominium association that has property insurance covering the common elements and at least some portion of the condominium units. In many states, this type of coverage is required by law or by the association's governing documents. If you give us more information about your situation and state, people may be able to give you more specific advice.

There are several things a condominium association should consider when insurance premiums are increasing.

1. Prevent claims in the first place.

The best insurance claim is often the one you never have.

Consider installing automatic water-leak detection devices, particularly in locations with a history of water losses. Some systems can detect leaks and automatically shut off the water. Ask your insurance carrier whether the particular system qualifies for an insurance discount, but even if it doesn't, preventing a major water loss may save the association far more than the cost of the equipment.

Also make sure the association is keeping up with basic risk-management measures, including required smoke alarms, fire extinguishers, fire protection systems, electrical inspections where appropriate, and maintenance of roofs, plumbing, heating systems, and other components that can cause significant claims.

2. Pay particular attention to vacant units.

A vacant condominium can be a significant insurance risk because a small plumbing leak can continue for days or weeks before anyone discovers it.

If owners leave their units vacant for extended periods, the association should consider requiring periodic inspections. The association may also want rules requiring appropriate winterization and maintenance of heat during cold weather.

Owners should understand that their individual insurance policy may also have requirements concerning vacancy or unoccupied units. The association should coordinate its requirements with its insurance agent.

3. Review your deductible.

One of the most effective ways to reduce the association's insurance premium may be to increase the deductible.

A higher deductible is essentially a decision to retain more of the risk rather than paying the insurance company to assume that risk. The association still maintains insurance for major losses, but it is responsible for a larger amount before insurance begins paying.

However, don't simply raise the deductible without considering how the deductible will be paid after a loss.

The association should review its governing documents and applicable state law to determine whether a master-policy deductible can be charged to an individual owner, allocated among owners, or must be paid from association funds and potentially recovered through a special assessment.

4. Review your governing documents before changing the deductible.

Some condominium declarations or bylaws contain provisions specifying maximum deductibles or requiring particular types of insurance coverage.

If your governing documents contain outdated deductible requirements, the association may want to consider amending them rather than simply adopting an insurance policy that conflicts with the documents. Otherwise, you could potentially create an unnecessary dispute after a major loss.

Don't assume the Board can simply ignore a provision in the declaration because the insurance market has changed. Have your attorney and insurance professional review it.

5. Make sure owners understand the consequences of a large deductible.

Suppose your association has a $100,000 deductible and suffers a $500,000 covered loss. The insurance company may pay $400,000, leaving the association responsible for the first $100,000.

Where does that $100,000 come from?

It could potentially come from association reserves, operating funds, a special assessment, or an assessment or charge against one or more owners, depending on your documents and state law.

Owners should understand this risk before the association adopts a very high deductible.

I would strongly encourage owners to discuss loss assessment coverage with their individual condo insurance agent. This coverage can, depending on the policy, help pay an owner's share of certain assessments resulting from a covered loss or other insured event. Owners should specifically ask their agent about the amount of coverage, the applicable deductible, and whether it applies to an assessment arising from the condominium association's master-policy deductible.

6. Don't assume the association's master policy covers everything.

The Board should have its insurance agent explain, in plain English, exactly where the association's coverage ends and the individual owner's HO-6 policy begins.

Depending on the governing documents and the state's condominium law, the master policy may cover the building and common elements but have limitations regarding improvements, betterments, fixtures, flooring, cabinets, appliances, personal property, and other items inside a unit.

Owners should be required—or at least strongly encouraged—to carry appropriate individual condo insurance and adequate liability and loss-assessment coverage.

7. Review coverage, not just the premium.

When comparing insurance proposals, don't simply choose the company with the lowest price.

Look at the deductible, wind and hail deductible, replacement-cost coverage, ordinance-or-law coverage, water and sewer backup coverage, equipment breakdown coverage, exclusions, sublimits, and other important provisions.

A lower premium accompanied by substantially worse coverage may not be a bargain.

8. Work with your insurance broker on loss history.

If the association has had frequent claims, the Board should ask the broker what types of losses are driving the premiums and what specific steps would help reduce future losses.

In some circumstances, filing a relatively small claim can have consequences beyond the amount of the immediate payment, particularly if the association develops a poor claims history. That doesn't mean an association should fail to report a legitimate claim or violate its policy. It does mean the Board should understand its policy's reporting requirements and discuss claims strategy with its insurance professional.

The overall goal should be risk management, not simply insurance shopping.

A condominium association can often do more to control its long-term insurance costs by preventing water and fire losses, maintaining the property, managing vacant units, educating owners, and structuring an appropriate deductible than by simply looking for another insurance company every year.

And before making a significant change to the deductible or insurance requirements, I would have the Board's insurance professional and attorney review the governing documents and applicable state law. Insurance and condominium deductible rules vary considerably from state to state.
MichaelS56 (Minnesota)
Posts: 872
Posted:
Thank you everyone for your suggestions. I will forward them to the board.
BryonW (Massachusetts)
Posts: 69
Posted:
Hi MichaelS56 - my $0.02: when shopping around, make sure you go to multiple brokers. Do not accept the old line about "I am an independent broker, I can get quotes from multiple insurance carriers, so I will do all the shopping around for you, you don't need to contact anyone else."

Two years ago, my board went along with that, and took a 9.5% year-over-year increase in premiums.

Last year, we added two other brokers to the mix, and SURPRISE, our existing broker got a quote from our current carrier that was $100 per year less than the previous year! And this was for a slightly higher insured value of the buildings. So the rate in terms of premium per insured value actually fell by 4.9% year-over-year.

One factor to consider is splitting up the carriers. You get no benefit by more than 1 broker contacting the same insurance carrier. We've heard that in cases like this, the carrier will be loyal to the first broker who contacted them, and refuse to give quotes to the others.

This actually provides a polite way to let the broker know that we were shopping: we asked him to pick the top 3 insurance carriers that he wanted to approach with our business. He gave us the list. We told him that he would have the exclusive chance to get quotes from those 3 carriers. And we told the other brokers not to contact those 3.

For reference (rates vary widely!): we pay approx $30,000 per year for our property and liability package, with a property limit of about $10.5 Million dollars. Rate of $2.85 per $1,000 of insured value. 100 year old brick buildings, 4 story, with no fire sprinklers.

We pay an additional $3,500/year for our umbrella liability, directors & officers, and workers comp (zero employees on payroll - its only a backup in case a vendor happens to be uninsured).

šŸŽÆ You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • āœ“ Ask follow-up questions
  • āœ“ Share your experience
  • āœ“ Get expert advice
  • āœ“ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚔ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here