FayeE (New York)
Posts: 49
Posts: 49
Posted:
First
This is an Condominium. Homeowners own their condo. Each building has 2 sides- 2 condos on each side One up and one down
Second
A homeowner recently contacted the management company to info them that he/she is getting a ESA animal.
The management company informed the homeowner that they have to submit the proper paper work and the Board will make a decision.
Third
I informed the President (who is against this) that if they have the proper paperwork that we (HOA) can not deny them according to the Law. He got upset up and quoted the Law for Landlords. I informed him that he is not a Landlord that our Homeowners own their condo.
Question is:
Since our setup here is like an apartment building what does the Law say about this setup.
We are not Landlords. We are an HOA Board and we do allow 2 cats per Condo. If the ESA is a cat there is no issue. It is dogs that the President does not want. The people that bought the Condo from the beginning could keep their dog. By now all those dogs are dead. We also have a nuisance law when it comes to pets
Some back history:
One homeowner had a dog and it was a ESA dog. The President told the management company to write a letter saying they had to get rid of the dog because it barks and the neighbor did not want any noise. He made the MC send a letter to get rid of dog or be fined. I informed the President of the Law but his out was the nuisance clause.
I also said there are items that can silence dogs and even items for the neighbor bothered by the noise. Since there were no more complaints the dog is gone.
The real issue with the President:
The President hates the person wanting the current ESA. They have been battling for decades. The President has been pushing this homeowner all the time from even telling this person that they can not back their car into a parking space but the President does. We have no law restricting backing into a parking space. This kind of child behavior goes on all the time and even with me, the VP, he bosses me around like he is the Ruler over all the Board.
President says:
"That people needing a ESA or a Support Animal, that their rights can not unsurp his rights" a quote
Then he added THE END. meaning no more discussion he is right.
of course i responded and said a the end " Now the END"
Course of Action?
The Law says the HOA can not deny an ESA or a Support Animal.
Thank you
This is an Condominium. Homeowners own their condo. Each building has 2 sides- 2 condos on each side One up and one down
Second
A homeowner recently contacted the management company to info them that he/she is getting a ESA animal.
The management company informed the homeowner that they have to submit the proper paper work and the Board will make a decision.
Third
I informed the President (who is against this) that if they have the proper paperwork that we (HOA) can not deny them according to the Law. He got upset up and quoted the Law for Landlords. I informed him that he is not a Landlord that our Homeowners own their condo.
Question is:
Since our setup here is like an apartment building what does the Law say about this setup.
We are not Landlords. We are an HOA Board and we do allow 2 cats per Condo. If the ESA is a cat there is no issue. It is dogs that the President does not want. The people that bought the Condo from the beginning could keep their dog. By now all those dogs are dead. We also have a nuisance law when it comes to pets
Some back history:
One homeowner had a dog and it was a ESA dog. The President told the management company to write a letter saying they had to get rid of the dog because it barks and the neighbor did not want any noise. He made the MC send a letter to get rid of dog or be fined. I informed the President of the Law but his out was the nuisance clause.
I also said there are items that can silence dogs and even items for the neighbor bothered by the noise. Since there were no more complaints the dog is gone.
The real issue with the President:
The President hates the person wanting the current ESA. They have been battling for decades. The President has been pushing this homeowner all the time from even telling this person that they can not back their car into a parking space but the President does. We have no law restricting backing into a parking space. This kind of child behavior goes on all the time and even with me, the VP, he bosses me around like he is the Ruler over all the Board.
President says:
"That people needing a ESA or a Support Animal, that their rights can not unsurp his rights" a quote
Then he added THE END. meaning no more discussion he is right.
of course i responded and said a the end " Now the END"
Course of Action?
The Law says the HOA can not deny an ESA or a Support Animal.
Thank you