šŸ’¬ Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚔ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

PauG (Maryland)
Posts: 53
Posted:
Last fall, in an effort to improve our community, we had flower beds planted at the end of each court in our HOA. Each bed includes an ornamental tree, some boxwoods, and three rows of tulips. Well, the tulips look beautiful. But in one court some children took a pair of scissors and cut every single one of them and took them home to their mom.

Yesterday I was walking the neighborhood and saw what had been done. Another board member was outside with neighbors. They all complained to me that it was the chidren in 5-5 that had cut the flowers. The lady came outside and I politely asked her if she knew about it. She said she did and that her children thought they were wild flowers and that they wanted to give her flowers, that they didn't know and it wasn't serious. I then politely mentioned that she let the children know not to pick any flowers other than ones that might be growing in their yard. She got pretty nasty about it. Then she went up the street, got her friend, and hemmed and hawed the whole time she came down the sidewalk.

I got to thinking. If she fails to think it is important to teach her children not to take something that isn't in their yard, then what will be the next thing? Will she not think it is serious when they steal something from school and say they didn't know? Then when they are teenagers and the shoplift, will she say the same thing...it isn't serious?

I know they are just kids. But if had been my children (who are grown) I would have taken them to the store and bought new flowers and had them plant them.

Am I overboard, or is there something you all would do differently?
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Pau, I am with you. My mother would have thanked you for letting her know. Then she would have marched me up to your house to apologize. Then bought new flowers, made me plant them, and repay her for the cost. Sadly, for many it is a different world today.
RickR3 (California)
Posts: 42
Posted:
Pau,

I had somewhat of a similar issue. Behind our clubhouse that is not visible from the street there was fast food wrappers and such being left around about two nights a week. I kept trying to catch the culprits to ask them to clean up after themselves.
Finally I caught them. They ran away, I confiscated a bunch of drug paraphenalia. One of the homeowners came down to my house the next day saying I had no right to stop them from using the area. I told him I as going to ask them to clean up after themselves and also asked him if he wanted me to turn the drug parapenalia over to the police. He went quite. Since that time father and son participate in all clean up and work parties that the association has.

Rick
HOA President.
BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
Pau:

I agree with you, my rear end would have been sore had I done that many years ago.
PauG (Maryland)
Posts: 53
Posted:
My mother, too, would have disciplined me. This woman said it wasn't serious and her children didn't know. It's frustrating.

I don't know what the board can do. We are concerned that it will happen again. If we send a letter, she will blow us off.
RonaldW (South Carolina)
Posts: 901
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By PauG on 05/02/2007 10:46 AM
.......................
I don't know what the board can do. We are concerned that it will happen again. If we send a letter, she will blow us off.

I would charge her the cost of replacing the flowers. Even if she doesn't pay, it will be on record. It was vandalism or destruction of property even though it wasn't a great deal. The HOA cannot tell her how to raise her children but it can hold her responsible for their behavior while on association property.

Ron
SC
JulieS (Georgia)
Posts: 412
Posted:
My mother tied me to the neighbor's fence once for picking her peonies...I was probably 4 or 5 and it didn't stop me from picking flowers to bring home to my mother. She always asked me where I got them and of course, it was from some neighbors yard on the way home.

Personally, I don't think this is such a big issue as the tulips would have lost their petals in a week or two...and they will come up again next year. It would be unrealistic to have the homeowner try to purchase blooming tulip bulbs to replace those picked by the children. The mother should talk to the children and explain that they are only allowed to pick flowers in their own yard and not others.

And by the way, I have never been in trouble with the law and I turned out to be quite normal and responsible...and as an adult, have my own yard full of flowers.

Life is too short, I could only wish my mother was still here so that I may bring her some flowers.
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
I think the parent should be responsible for the replacement cost of the flowers.

Several years ago we increased our basic fine from $25 to $100 per violation.

$100 gets their attention.

As with your property we attempted to improve the appearance by placing barrels with flowers along the main roadway and at the front entrance.

Well some not so young kids decided to rip the flowers out of the ground and toss them around the property.

A witness to their actions allowed the Board to fine the unit owner the cost of the flowers and the fine of $100.

For the next few years after the word went around no one bothers the flowers.

Why should the funds of owners be wasted due to the actions of some.

The Mother needs to explain those flowers are not planted to give them a supply for gifting.

We do live in a different world and in my opinion that world requires some to be educated by using consequenses to influence their future behavior.

Jadedone4 (Virginia)
Posts: 495
Posted:
Unfortunately, the underlying "theme" of this post is what plagues most HOAs. It is not simply a "parental" issue with regards to training/raising their children properly (and that could be considered "subjective").

I think it (as the theme evolved into on this post and responses), has to do with the "world in which we live..." The reason we have HOAs, POA, and other community based associations - is that at some point government (local, state, federal) became too cumbersome, or inept to respond to the needs of owners. We went from the "full service" of a most of our community needs being handled by a municipality, to "self-service" where we do it ourselves (HOA, Board, MC, subcontractors, etc).

Take the "tulips" situation... under the "full service" and "self-service" models, most of the options remain the same (march to neighbor whose children damaged the flowers, call cops, seek civil or criminal penalties, etc). Somewhere the idea of talking and actually engaging the folks that live near you (I think Webster's might call them neighbors), fell to the wayside for both models. It became "easier" for most to "not get involved..." because it required "too much time/work" - and we are all overworked, and outta time.

Then when either model (full or self) has a body that wants to actually enforce what most already KNOW to be proper conduct - it ruffles some feathers. Folks want to speak about how "rights" have been violated - equally forgetting (or maybe it is old age, I had to search for my glasses this AM, and they were on top my head), that they play a ROLE in the complete cycle of abiding by the rules. If you do not infringe on the rule, chances are it will not affect you - however when the rule is infringed, everyone who is expected to follow, plays a role in assuring that things move back to the rules intent.

Personal note, my wife and I both had a chuckle on the replies about "marching them back up and having them apologize, re-plant, and pay for damages, etc. She is a "TK" (teacher's kid) twice (both parents), my parents owned a local business where most if not all of the locals frequented. Suffice to say... stuff that we did, got "home" before we did. I knew I had a problem when the common threat of sending a kid "off to military school" was actually one that I welcomed (and eventually did happened) - at least there no one knew my parents... (yet). Smile

DJ1 (Ontario)
Posts: 798
Posted:
I'm with JulieS.

No it should not have happened but if we were all honest...and could remember back that far...I bet we all picked flowers for our mothers.

I don't think any further action is required (at this point) because I'm sure the mother has talked to the kids about where they got the flowers. Just being confronted about it was embarassing and some mothers would get defensive ESPECIALLY with some of the posters who think new flowers should be bought to replace those (that will bloom again) or that a violation notice should be sent for this time.

Those positions seem like an OVER-REACTION. We'd all have grown up criminals if our flower picking youth days were indicative of a unabated pattern of criminal behaviour.

Relax, chill, smell the roses (unless they get cut too!). Sit back and watch the poppies bloom!
RonaldW (South Carolina)
Posts: 901
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DJ1 on 05/03/2007 5:00 AM
I'm with JulieS.

Those positions seem like an OVER-REACTION. We'd all have grown up criminals if our flower picking youth days were indicative of a unabated pattern of criminal behaviour.

Relax, chill, smell the roses (unless they get cut too!). Sit back and watch the poppies bloom!

The flowers were planted with association funds and the children stole them. That's vandalism, destruction of property, and theft. Is it a big deal? Well, it's not a felony, but if this is not addressed, how would the association recover costs from the next group of vandals? Let's say they break out all the lights at the entrance or spray paint the gazebo.

Re-reading the OP, the parent didn't seem to be too impressed when told of her children's vandalism, and I doubt she did anything to impress on her children that this was not to happen again.

$100.00 as someone suggested, seems high to me, but if this is the established fine structure, that's OK, $100.00 it is. The very least that can be expected is that the family pay for the cost of the items vandalised (the flowers and the cost of planting them).

Ron
SC
DJ1 (Ontario)
Posts: 798
Posted:
Yeah Ron, the Association paid for them and the children STOLE em in the true definition of the word. Ever lied Ron, yeah it all comes down to 'degree' of offense, learning from it, and ensuring it doesn't happen again.

Your example isn't a fair comparison in any way. The tulips while removed, WILL FLOWER AGAIN. Breaking lights or other vandalism is permanent.

All I'm saying is the kids WERE doing something nice, even if they didn't appreciate the appropriate 'boundaries', THAT'S WHY THEY CALL EM KIDS. Parents CAN also get defensive of their kids even if the parent KNOWS it was wrong....depending on how the issue was broached with them.

It isn't even about condoning the behaviour as I agree it was wrong, and teaching the kids right from wrong is important. That DOESN'T have to come from imposing a fine cause it won't be the kids that pay anyway.

Maybe in the discussion with the parent it could have been suggested the kids weed the flowerbed to make up for the loss of visual enjoyment to the community.

If you want to line your HOA coffers fine everything in sight including your violations cause if you are like the HOA around me (I'm not a member) every single home is in violation so using your logic a fine is the only solution.

Will make for a REAL enjoyable neighborhood!
RonaldW (South Carolina)
Posts: 901
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DJ1 on 05/03/2007 6:46 AM
Yeah Ron, the Association paid for them and the children STOLE em in the true definition of the word. Ever lied Ron, yeah it all comes down to 'degree' of offense, learning from it, and ensuring it doesn't happen again.

Your example isn't a fair comparison in any way. The tulips while removed, WILL FLOWER AGAIN. Breaking lights or other vandalism is permanent.

All I'm saying is the kids WERE doing something nice, even if they didn't appreciate the appropriate 'boundaries', THAT'S WHY THEY CALL EM KIDS. Parents CAN also get defensive of their kids even if the parent KNOWS it was wrong....depending on how the issue was broached with them.

It isn't even about condoning the behaviour as I agree it was wrong, and teaching the kids right from wrong is important. That DOESN'T have to come from imposing a fine cause it won't be the kids that pay anyway.

Maybe in the discussion with the parent it could have been suggested the kids weed the flowerbed to make up for the loss of visual enjoyment to the community.

If you want to line your HOA coffers fine everything in sight including your violations cause if you are like the HOA around me (I'm not a member) every single home is in violation so using your logic a fine is the only solution.

Will make for a REAL enjoyable neighborhood!

Well, they did STEAL them, didn't they? The definition of theft being "to take someon elses property without their permission".

If you will take the time to re-read my first two posts, I did not suggest a "fine" to "line my HOA coffers", I suggested that the family be required to reimburse the HOA for the cost of the items taken. I believe this is fair to the association members and to the family of the vandals and it will provide some incentive to the parents to educate their children in responsibility and good citizenship. How would you feel if they stole your flowers from your yard? How would you feel if older "children" drove their cars on your lawn and tore it up? It will grow back, right?

As far as a "REAL enjoyable neighborhood", how enjoyable is a neighborhood where personal property is not safe?, Where "children" (whatever their age) have no respect for their neighbor's or the association's property?

If you live in OZ, children will be children. If you live in the real world, children who do not learn responsibility and good citizenship at an early age will be vandals, then criminals.

Ron
SC
DwightT (Idaho)
Posts: 664
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DJ1 on 05/03/2007 5:00 AM

No it should not have happened but if we were all honest...and could remember back that far...I bet we all picked flowers for our mothers.

When my kids where young they pulled some bone-headed stunts and I would yell at them for it. My wife would occasionally remind me that I probably pulled similar bone-headed stunts when I was a kid. My response to that was "Yes, I did. And when my father found out I got my butt chewed. Now it's my turn." And from talking to my grand-parents, I know that my dad pulled some pretty bone-headed stunts when he was a kid also (and subsequently got his butt chewed as well).

That's how it is supposed to work: kids will do some stupid things simply because they are kids and haven't learned any better yet, and parents are supposed to use that as a "teaching opportunity" to correct their child's behavior. When a parent simply brushes it off by saying that it was "just some flowers", then they have not only missed an opportunity to teach their child, but they are showing the rest of the community that they just don't care.

Julie states that she "turned out to be quite normal and responsible" even though she stole flowers from the neighbors as a kid. However, she also still remembers when her mother disciplined her for it. Maybe the reason she turned out OK had more to do with the fact that her mother cared enough to take the time to teach her that the behavior was wrong when she was young, even though it may seem trivial now.

I don't thing Pau necessarily wants the HOA to punish the kids, or even the parents. I think that if the mother would have shown at least a little concern then everybody involved could have seen the whole matter as trivial and it could have been dropped. But by the mother just blowing it off, Pau is right to be concerned that next time it may be something not so trivial. Will the mother blow that off as well? The mother has now made it difficult for Pau to trust those kids.

In my opinion Pau's HOA doesn't really need to go any further with this particular incident. However I also wouldn't blame them if they start to watch that family a little closer in the future.
DJ1 (Ontario)
Posts: 798
Posted:
Ron,

'Well, they did STEAL them, didn't they? The definition of theft being "to take someon elses property without their permission". '

I guess the lawyer they'd hire would respond it isn't theft since as members of the HOA it was THEIR property (maybe only joint ownership), so they will put them back when their turn is over.

Maybe because they are tulips I see this as different from even some other plant. Kind of like a flower on a tree...the tree is still there to produce more. If the kids pulled up the entire bulb then there would be more of an issue.

Fines don't have to be the be all end all to resolving issues in a HOA do they?

I agree the kids need to be educated on the appropriate behaviour but look at the motiviation for the deed first and rspond accordingly.

They wanted to make Mom feel good and picked some flowers. That's it, that's all.

They now know they should not have picked these ones.

Your examples of comparable offenses is somewhat laughable, ie. older kids driving and tearing up my lawn.

1. Somebody doing that is not trying to do a good deed.
2. Older kids would KNOW it was wrong.
3. The damage from such action would not just regrow, there would be ruts and permanent damage.

Gotta do better than that Ron. PS. Are you a golfer with your weed lawn fixation?
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Flowers are meant to be enjoyed. The kids did something they didn't know any better. They wanted to give flowers to their mother because they thought she liked them. An innoncent act of children in my opinion. It's not like the flowers were going to last much longer anyways. I often cut off blooms of my plants and put them in the house occassionally. The blooms are meant to be enjoyed. They are going to come back again next year.
When I was a teenager, my friend and I would walk by a cementary on the way home. One day we decided to explore the cementary. We noticed that some graves had more flowers than others. Mind you the flowers were old plastic flowers that the cemetary people would eventually throw away. Me and my friend decided to go and take the flowers off the graves of the ones with lots of flowers and put them on the children's graves. Often stopping and reading the marker or lifting to see the pictures. We did this for almost an hour until the caretaker caught us. At first he was "mad" because he thought we were "vandalizing" the place. He had to clean the place up. We were sooo scared that we blirted out what we were doing. His expression changed quickly. Instead of tossing us out, he lead us to another part of the cemetary. It was there that we found ALL the tossed out flowers the caretaker's remove due to maintanence. The pile was 10 feet high! He told us we could take all we wanted from that pile instead. So we spent another 1/2 hour going around the cemetary picking out neglected graves to put flowers on.
Now would you call us Vandals? What else were the flowers good for? Let's take a positive look at the situation. Yes, it was hard work putting the flowers in. However, it was for the people's enjoyment. It's just a different definition of enjoyment.
I believe the kids should apologize and be told what they did wrong. After that, teach them how to plant their own flowers. Maybe even give the kids their own flower bed. Encourage them to plant and let these be the flowers that are okay to pick at will. Let's not forget these are children!

Former HOA President
BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
I think we are all missing the original point where the mother was approached and blew it off and was offended that someone called her on her kids behavior. I have no doubt the kids didn't mean to do any harm and probably didn't know better. But the mother does. If someone approached me about it I would have apologized to them and explained that they didn't know better and I would talk to my kids about it. I think that is all he really wanted from the mother. I don't think he wants them on a chain gang picking up trash or in Juvenille detention or on Court TV. Yes he has the right to report it to the Police and make the parents pay restitution, however, it would have been a nice gesture for the parents to do that on their own.

What has ever happened to good decent manners in this country. We all make mistakes, especially kids, a please, thank you and I am sorry can go a long way if we all started treated people like people again.

To answer the original question, yes, I am appalled at the mother's reaction, she is the adult and should handle the situation better. It is her job to teach kids right from wrong, it may just be flowers, but anyone who has kids knows there are teaching moments all day, every day, and this would have been a good one to say, "hey I appreciate the gesture, but you can not destroy other people's property."

RonaldW (South Carolina)
Posts: 901
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BradP on 05/04/2007 6:42 AM
I think we are all missing the original point where the mother was approached and blew it off and was offended that someone called her on her kids behavior. I have no doubt the kids didn't mean to do any harm and probably didn't know better. But the mother does. If someone approached me about it I would have apologized to them and explained that they didn't know better and I would talk to my kids about it. I think that is all he really wanted from the mother. I don't think he wants them on a chain gang picking up trash or in Juvenille detention or on Court TV. Yes he has the right to report it to the Police and make the parents pay restitution, however, it would have been a nice gesture for the parents to do that on their own.

What has ever happened to good decent manners in this country. We all make mistakes, especially kids, a please, thank you and I am sorry can go a long way if we all started treated people like people again.

To answer the original question, yes, I am appalled at the mother's reaction, she is the adult and should handle the situation better. It is her job to teach kids right from wrong, it may just be flowers, but anyone who has kids knows there are teaching moments all day, every day, and this would have been a good one to say, "hey I appreciate the gesture, but you can not destroy other people's property."


Brad, I don't believe I missed the original point even though I was led into an argument with a couple posters.

The kids did wrong. OK, we all did a few wrong things in our youth, but that's no excuse to overlook what other people do. Most of the time, we got caught and punished and learned not to do wrong. This is what needs to happen to these children for their own good.

I too, am appalled by the mother's reaction, that's my reason for suggesting charging the family for the replacement cost. The mother, as well as the children, need to learn respect for other people's property and the mother needs to learn how to be a good parent.

Ron
SC
BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
Ron,

That post wasn't directed at you, and I agree 100% with what you said.
RonaldW (South Carolina)
Posts: 901
Posted:
I spent 32 years working in a very large public school system, the last seven assigned to a large high school in a lower income section of the county. I have seen the results of poor parenting and lack of discipline first hand. And it's nearly impossible to turn a child around once they have picked up their bad behavior.

Ron
SC
DJ1 (Ontario)
Posts: 798
Posted:
Brad and Ron,

"She said she did and that her children thought they were wild flowers and that they wanted to give her flowers, that they didn't know and it wasn't serious. I then politely mentioned that she let the children know not to pick any flowers other than ones that might be growing in their yard. She got pretty nasty about it."

You both seem to attribute more to the mother's reaction than I do and maybe that is partly why you feel more action (punitive) is needed.

1. She didn't hide the fact she knew. She may have even told the kids when she realized where they got them from not to take them from there again.

2. We all seemed to agree 'it wasn't serious' and it is now only serious because you don't think she responded how you think she should have.

3. I think as soon as the OP said "I then politely mentioned that she let her children know not to pick any flowers other than the ones that might be growing in their yard" the OP OVERSTEPPED into telling the mother how to do her job and THAT is why she got nasty. FURTHER the OP has no right to limit their flower picking to their OWN yard. There are other places to pick flowers that wouldn't be a problem.

As far as restitution, I reiterate that these are BULBS and therefore they will bloom again next year exactly when they are supposed to so buying replacement plants isn't necessary to restore what time will do on its own.

RonaldW (South Carolina)
Posts: 901
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DJ1 on 05/04/2007 8:57 PM
Brad and Ron,

.............. As far as restitution, I reiterate that these are BULBS and therefore they will bloom again next year exactly when they are supposed to so buying replacement plants isn't necessary to restore what time will do on its own.

It's called "consequences". It's intended to deter bad behavior in the future. Much like a fine for speeding.

Ron
SC
DJ1 (Ontario)
Posts: 798
Posted:
So you think they will do it again without imposing YOUR version of 'consequences'?

Guess you've never been given a second chance eh/
BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
DJ1:

The mother never apologized. I simple "I am sorry, I will take care of it" is all that was needed. I don't know if you have kids or not, but when mine do something they aren't supposed to do there is consequence to reinforce that it is not acceptable behavior. 99% of the parents on here will agree if you don't punish a child why would they stop the activity.
PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
to PauG:
With all the banter over how to discipline and raise children and what type of restitution is in order for misbehavior on the children's part...it is not for us to know if, after the fact, the parents disciplined the children or not. And its not really our responsibility to see that she does...nor should we assume...

But, as far as the flowers being picked, the Board has the option of billing the owner a charge for the flower bulbs that were interfered with; a small charge that would set an example that the flowers cost the assn. money and are 'off limits'. It would set to right all involved.

DJ1 (Ontario)
Posts: 798
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By PaulM on 05/05/2007 7:24 AM
to PauG:
With all the banter over how to discipline and raise children and what type of restitution is in order for misbehavior on the children's part...it is not for us to know if, after the fact, the parents disciplined the children or not. And its not really our responsibility to see that she does...nor should we assume...

But, as far as the flowers being picked, the Board has the option of billing the owner a charge for the flower bulbs that were interfered with; a small charge that would set an example that the flowers cost the assn. money and are 'off limits'. It would set to right all involved.


Apologize to who, the guy at the door? Based on what he said, he exceeded his authority when he went BEYOND just advising that the HOA flowers are off limits. He doesn't have jurisdiction over flowers everywhere. Most Mothers already know that but couldn't fix after the fact so the Mother may also have taken his obvious advise as lecturing her.

The bulbs remain, will bloom again, if the kids do it again, then it warrants action.

DJ1 (Ontario)
Posts: 798
Posted:
BradP, I do have kids and I would have first thanked them for doing something that was intended to be thoughful (That WAS the underlying motivation of the action NOT vandalism) and THEN in kid language I would have pointed out that the flowers they cut are there for everyone to enjoy so they are best left uncut.

RonaldW (South Carolina)
Posts: 901
Posted:
DJ1,

By your own admission, you are not only not an HOA board member or volunteer; you are not even a member of an HOA. Why do you feel the need to haunt this forum and argue with every post? Have you nothing better to do?

This forum is intended for "community association leaders to share ideas and learn". You are not part of the intended audience and most of your posts are disruptive to the discussions. Would you please leave us alone and let us get on with our business?

Thank you.

Ron
SC
JC3
Posts: 290
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RonaldW on 05/03/2007 7:10
Well, they did STEAL them, didn't they? The definition of theft being "to take someon elses property without their permission".

If you will take the time to re-read my first two posts, I did not suggest a "fine" to "line my HOA coffers", I suggested that the family be required to reimburse the HOA for the cost of the items taken. I believe this is fair to the association members and to the family of the vandals and it will provide some incentive to the parents to educate their children in responsibility and good citizenship. How would you feel if they stole your flowers from your yard? How would you feel if older "children" drove their cars on your lawn and tore it up? It will grow back, right?

As far as a "REAL enjoyable neighborhood", how enjoyable is a neighborhood where personal property is not safe?, Where "children" (whatever their age) have no respect for their neighbor's or the association's property?

If you live in OZ, children will be children. If you live in the real world, children who do not learn responsibility and good citizenship at an early age will be vandals, then criminals.

This reminds me of a long row of flowering trees lining the exterior of the boundries of homes and a shopping center. I passed it frequently for 8 to to years, several years ago, and rarely saw flowers on any of them, though that species was in bloom for months at a time in the region.
I figured the soil was bad, or this was a non-blooming relative.
Someone finally questioned the local newspaper, which set up surveillance. Turned out the numerous flowers were being picked regularly for boquets by a few older people for sale in their flower shop. If memory serves, they were fined and that suspended. They got off with a warning and a few hours community service, after making much money over many years. They were no longer permitted to take the flowers, and I would guess, suffered a severe loss of income. Passers-by finally got th enjoy the beauty of the trees in bloom.

Maybe they started off stealing for their mother, too.
DJ1 (Ontario)
Posts: 798
Posted:
Well Ron, when I came here it was as a member of a HOA. It is only because the Developer didn't register the CCR's that I then became a non-member (I have to thank my lawyer for discovering this). For ~5 years the Developer led 34 of the ~114 homeowners to believe we were members. During that time I learned the CCR's warts and all. I saw firsthand how things can go wrong, how members can be mislead etc etc. As I said I am in a somewhat unique position being a non-member in a HOA, not bound to the CCR's BUT my neighbours all around ARE members. That impacts me. I was involved as a volunteer as well. I continue to share examples (good and bad) of what I read here with members. Just because you don't agree with my perspective is no reason for me not to post it.
JC3
Posts: 290
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RonaldW on 05/05/2007 10:57 AM
DJ1,

By your own admission, you are not only not an HOA board member or volunteer; you are not even a member of an HOA. Why do you feel the need to haunt this forum and argue with every post? Have you nothing better to do?

This forum is intended for "community association leaders to share ideas and learn". You are not part of the intended audience and most of your posts are disruptive to the discussions. Would you please leave us alone and let us get on with our business?

Thank you.

AS I understand it, this forum IS open, anyone can respond or question. As I understand it, DJ1 has a right to be here. His/her responses have been valid, varied, and expand our horizons. S/He has a different point of view, and helps us (here) see things in a more neighborly way.
Homeowners associations are advertised, even if only subliminally, as friendly, caring, neighborhoods. His/Her posts have been evocative and maybe not in line with board members opinions of how things should be handled, but it is important that they be heard. So many people living in hoas are afraid to say anything, afraid (for good reason) they will targetted, and this person does not have to fear that.

S/He hasn't argued with every post, but maybe some of what s/he is saying is too close to home for some board members. The person that is most irritating is perhaps the one we should listen to best, more often, and as you suggest, learn from. That s/he does not live in an HOA and chooses to be here says something of the kind of person he is. S/He IS helping us get along with our business. A bunch of "yes-men" is not going to get us anywhere that _I_ would want to live in.
DJ1 (Ontario)
Posts: 798
Posted:
Thank you JC3,

One further point, before my lawyer discovered the developer's 'oversight'(?), I was targeted. BECAUSE I raised the question of whether the HOA should even go forward (just prior to turnover) because of the other significant errors he made. As it was clear each homeowner had a different set of 'facts' I felt it was important to establish whether residents wanted to move forward with the concept. I felt it was better to establish NOW if there was sufficient support to have a HOAin light of the errors below, rather than moving forward with so many on a different page and having all hell break loose thus further dividing residents. (the beach issue below did that!)

1. We were to have beach access but he failed to register the easement before selling waterfront lots. Some beach owners refused access to other residents resulting in a serious divide in the community.

2. Developer registered the CCR's on a piece of land that was to form a NON-HOA Town park/trail running through the subdivision thus making the Town (and therefore me as a taxpayer) a dues paying, voting member of the HOA. Once I advised the Town of this error they were pursuing it with the developer as this land was to be 'free and clear'. I don't know the current status so if it makes Ron feel better, maybe I AM still a HOA by virtue of being a taxpayer.

3. I could not get the 'interim' board to hold a resident meeting so I held one for the 34 (but members also attended). ONE 'kind' person scrawled "SELL AND MOVE" across my meeting notice.

So I had a first hand taste of being in a HOA!

Sorry to the OP for taking this in another direction.
TracyT (Maryland)
Posts: 228
Posted:
This has been an interesting string with many turns. There's been a lot of talk about childhoods and how neighbors and parents were involved/influenced when we messed up.

Someone once said 'it takes a village'. I too remember once doing something wrong in my neighbor's yard (maybe playing in the sand box without permission or the ball went into the flowers - something a kid would do . . .). My mother wasn't aware of it but the neighbor was and told me to stop, so I did. We respected our elders like that.

I just happened to be working at home one day this winter and noticed the neighborhood kids sledding outside. All was well until a couple of the kids headed toward the storm water drain pond. Then of course several more went down there and then some more. The hills were pretty slick and the pond was not completely frozen over and I could see they were getting ready to 'hang out' there. Did I call the HOA BOD to tattle on them? Did I call their parents? No. I went out and told them to get away from the pond. I realize that this is not "picking flowers", but it could have been a real disaster. They probably already knew they shouldn't have been there because they promptly followed my order and went back to their sledding.

If I had seen childern picking the community flowers and it bothered me I would have told them to stop or I may have called a BOD when it happened. If they [the kids] told their mother about what I said then she can be upset with me and/or can complain about me to the BOD, who would have agreed that picking the community flowers was wrong. Either way at least the childern would know even if their mother didn't say anything.

In contrast I ran into a neighbor at the store yesterday who seemed to complain about another neighbor's recent project. The context was the perception that because this person is on the BOD that the project got approved. I happen to know that the project was submitted to the CC, like everyone else is required and told her so. (I also know which of these two neighbors know the CCRs and which hasn't bothered to read them.)

My point is, and as someone else posted, what happened to decent people? Or to common sense for that matter?

I didn't grow up in an HOA and I'm not bashing them. To be very honest if my mother were finded $100 because I picked her some flowers, we probably would have had to go without meals for a couple of days. Having lived in HOAs, by choice, for the past 18 years it just seems like people (supposed "community") to want to make mountains out of mole hills of just this type of situation.

There is a difference in being a part of 'community', protecting community value and just being in someone else's business because you can. When will we grow up?
RonaldW (South Carolina)
Posts: 901
Posted:
I remember reading this somewhwere:

"Thou shall not steal."

Does it apply here?

Ron
SC
TracyT (Maryland)
Posts: 228
Posted:
Did you also read the one about 'honor thy father and mother'?
Jadedone4 (Virginia)
Posts: 495
Posted:
OK, went from flowers to biblical references.....

Can a member here call a "point of order" so that we stay on track.... is there a second...?

Next question regarding HOA and members please....
RonaldW (South Carolina)
Posts: 901
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By Jadedone4 on 05/06/2007 1:23 PM
OK, went from flowers to biblical references.....

Can a member here call a "point of order" so that we stay on track.... is there a second...?

We aree on track. The children stole the flowers and the parent apparently didn't think it was a problem. Some of the other posters don't seem to think so either.

Ron
SC
RonaldW (South Carolina)
Posts: 901
Posted:
That would be "We are on track". No edit function here.

Ron
SC
TracyT (Maryland)
Posts: 228
Posted:
Ok if your going to put the onus on the BOD then send a notice to all members reminding them that the flowers are for the benefit of the entire community and get on with life. If it happens again next year particually with the same family lets talk about fines, punishment and jail time.

T
RonaldW (South Carolina)
Posts: 901
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TracyT on 05/06/2007 4:25 PM
Ok if your going to put the onus on the BOD then send a notice to all members reminding them that the flowers are for the benefit of the entire community ........ T

No, we shouldn't have to tell them that, they should be able to figure out right from wrong by themselves.

Again, "Thou shall not steal".

Ron
SC
JC3
Posts: 290
Posted:
Mercy, Mercy, Mercy, Lord a'MERCY!
TracyT (Maryland)
Posts: 228
Posted:
Ok lets first see if this will go 3 pages, like Cats on Leashes, since we haven't heard anything from the OP, Pau. :-)

I've posted before that continuing education is just that. With the onset of HOAs comes a new set of rules that many have not had to adhere to before, despite 'community' effort and our up-bringing.

You may be working full time and dealing with those changes. And lets face it business needs/regulations are ever changeing. Its difficult enough for the average adult to balance work, children, life and HOA requirements. HOA requirements being the least of worries.

HOAs have to start at the basics. Communicate what detracts value (did cutting the tulips really do that?) and reinforce that.

T
DJ1 (Ontario)
Posts: 798
Posted:
Oh Jeez Ronald, if you're going to start quoting the bible...

Judge not, that ye be not judged.

I bet you never did anything wrong in your life. I don't think anyone said picking the flowers was not stealing (by definition) or was RIGHT, BUT if you look at everything as black or white without taking into account the circumstances or motivation for the 'act' then you are exactly the kind of person that should NEVER be on a BOD let alone allowed to live with other human beings!
CharlesW1 (Georgia)
Posts: 826
Posted:
I wasn’t going to post my two cents to this thread, but I’m compelled to do that anyway.

I’m sure it will become a three if not even a four pager, like ā€œcats on leashesā€. When it is an issue that affects homeowners (which board members are too) there will always be those who feel one way and are not open to any other interpretation, of the CC&R. Their interpretation isn’t correct, it’s black or white, no gray area It’s not wrong it just a bit stern, IMO.

As posted by others, I too agree that the mother of the child certainly should have been made aware of what her child had done and to be advised that if anything of this sort were to happen again, she would be assessed the fees to replace or repair. It’s neither here nor there, that she didn’t offer to replace the bulbs, maybe she should have but didn’t.

We are all in the agreement that these bulbs will grow again next year. I’m sure the flowers wouldn’t have lasted all that much longer this season anyway, maybe a month of two if that?!

I say deal with it on an individual biases, why involve the entire community over something so trivial. Yeah that’s right trivial! I’m the type of person who does follow the rules, but this is an exception to that rule. If you feel that strongly about accessing a fine for replacement, by all means feel free, but you are asking for ā€œtroubleā€ IMHO.

ā€œIfā€ you feel the community needs to know perhaps you could mention the recent ā€œvandalismā€ concerning the flowers in the monthly newsletter or mail a Special notice informing all homeowners of the recent situation (leaving out names of course) You don’t want to get into any legal situation. Something to the tune of, ā€œDue to the recent vandalism, there will be no flowers(Tulips, etc.) at the front entrance, please be aware that any person or persons found destroying, vandalizing, stealing or altering HOA property will be access a fine to off set any costs the association will accrue for such wrong doing.ā€

I don’t know just a thought though

Best of luck
Chuck W.

Charles E. Wafer Jr.

šŸŽÆ You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • āœ“ Ask follow-up questions
  • āœ“ Share your experience
  • āœ“ Get expert advice
  • āœ“ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚔ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here