💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

FionaC (California)
Posts: 212
Posted:
Our board this last month had open forum. Our board and manager only allows comments regarding out agenda items or reports of repair only.

I haven't been to a meeting where this was being done. It's new, I can't find it on DSA. Does this sound right?
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
Try This

Open Forum
">Open Forum
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
If all else fails.

http://www.davis-stirling.com/MainIndex/ExecutiveSessionMeetings/tabid/1769/Default.aspx
AnnD2 (Connecticut)
Posts: 76
Posted:
There is something about this in a book entitled "Become an Effective Condo Board Member" by Sandra F. Rosen. Basically what she recommends is that boards allow members of their community make comments throughout the meeting as well as at the beginning and at the end of each board meeting. Robert's Rules (www.robertsrules.com), also encourages organizations to allow discussions--in an orderly fashion--throughout their meetings.

Of course, the issue is time and it must be understood that the president of the board, whose job it is primarily according to Robert's Rules, is to preside, must afford people the opportunity to express their views, while also preventing them from taking over the meeting.

The actually structure of the open forum can be determined by the organization: how many minutes at the beginning and end of the meetings and at what points during the meeting comments from the observers are allowed. It is law in CT that all board meetings should be open and opportunity must be given for comments. The specific interpretation of how this is to play out is left up to each condo/HOA.
BarbaraB10 (California)
Posts: 117
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By FionaC on 02/15/2011 8:31 PM
Our board this last month had open forum. Our board and manager only allows comments regarding out agenda items or reports of repair only.

I haven't been to a meeting where this was being done. It's new, I can't find it on DSA. Does this sound right?

Hi FionaC:

This is the link to the ca.gov website that lists the California Civil Code 1363.05 AKA "Open Meeting Act"

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=civ&group=01001-02000&file=1363.03-1363.09

Sections h & i sound pertinent to your situation. Hope this helps.

1363.05. (a) This section shall be known and may be cited as the
Common Interest Development Open Meeting Act.
(b) Any member of the association may attend meetings of the board
of directors of the association, except when the board adjourns to
executive session to consider litigation, matters relating to the
formation of contracts with third parties, member discipline,
personnel matters, or to meet with a member, upon the member's
request, regarding the member's payment of assessments, as specified
in Section 1367 or 1367.1. The board of directors of the association
shall meet in executive session, if requested by a member who may be
subject to a fine, penalty, or other form of discipline, and the
member shall be entitled to attend the executive session.
(c) Any matter discussed in executive session shall be generally
noted in the minutes of the immediately following meeting that is
open to the entire membership.
(d) The minutes, minutes proposed for adoption that are marked to
indicate draft status, or a summary of the minutes, of any meeting of
the board of directors of an association, other than an executive
session, shall be available to members within 30 days of the meeting.
The minutes, proposed minutes, or summary minutes shall be
distributed to any member of the association upon request and upon
reimbursement of the association's costs for making that
distribution.
(e) Members of the association shall be notified in writing at the
time that the pro forma budget required in Section 1365 is
distributed, or at the time of any general mailing to the entire
membership of the association, of their right to have copies of the
minutes of meetings of the board of directors, and how and where
those minutes may be obtained.
(f) Unless the time and place of meeting is fixed by the bylaws,
or unless the bylaws provide for a longer period of notice, members
shall be given notice of the time and place of a meeting as defined
in subdivision (j), except for an emergency meeting, at least four
days prior to the meeting. Notice shall be given by posting the
notice in a prominent place or places within the common area and by
mail to any owner who had requested notification of board meetings by
mail, at the address requested by the owner. Notice may also be
given, by mail or delivery of the notice to each unit in the
development or by newsletter or similar means of communication. The
notice shall contain the agenda for the meeting.
(g) An emergency meeting of the board may be called by the
president of the association, or by any two members of the governing
body other than the president, if there are circumstances that could
not have been reasonably foreseen which require immediate attention
and possible action by the board, and which of necessity make it
impracticable to provide notice as required by this section.
(h) The board of directors of the association shall permit any
member of the association to speak at any meeting of the association
or the board of directors, except for meetings of the board held in
executive session. A reasonable time limit for all members of the
association to speak to the board of directors or before a meeting of
the association shall be established by the board of directors.
(i) (1) Except as described in paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive,
the board of directors of the association may not discuss or take
action on any item at a nonemergency meeting unless the item was
placed on the agenda included in the notice that was posted and
distributed pursuant to subdivision (f). This subdivision does not
prohibit a resident who is not a member of the board from speaking on
issues not on the agenda.
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a member of the board of
directors, a managing agent or other agent of the board of directors,
or a member of the staff of the board of directors, may do any of
the following:
(A) Briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by a
person speaking at a meeting as described in subdivision (h).
(B) Ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement,
or make a brief report on his or her own activities, whether in
response to questions posed by a member of the association or based
upon his or her own initiative.
(3) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the board of directors or a
member of the board of directors, subject to rules or procedures of
the board of directors, may do any of the following:
(A) Provide a reference to, or provide other resources for factual
information to, its managing agent or other agents or staff.
(B) Request its managing agent or other agents or staff to report
back to the board of directors at a subsequent meeting concerning any
matter, or take action to direct its managing agent or other agents
or staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda.
(C) Direct its managing agent or other agents or staff to perform
administrative tasks that are necessary to carry out this
subdivision.
(4) (A) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the board of directors may
take action on any item of business not appearing on the agenda
posted and distributed pursuant to subdivision (f) under any of the
following conditions:
(i) Upon a determination made by a majority of the board of
directors present at the meeting that an emergency situation exists.
An emergency situation exists if there are circumstances that could
not have been reasonably foreseen by the board, that require
immediate attention and possible action by the board, and that, of
necessity, make it impracticable to provide notice.
(ii) Upon a determination made by the board by a vote of
two-thirds of the members present at the meeting, or, if less than
two-thirds of total membership of the board is present at the
meeting, by a unanimous vote of the members present, that there is a
need to take immediate action and that the need for action came to
the attention of the board after the agenda was posted and
distributed pursuant to subdivision (f).
(iii) The item appeared on an agenda that was posted and
distributed pursuant to subdivision (f) for a prior meeting of the
board of directors that occurred not more than 30 calendar days
before the date that action is taken on the item and, at the prior
meeting, action on the item was continued to the meeting at which the
action is taken.
(B) Before discussing any item pursuant to this paragraph, the
board of directors shall openly identify the item to the members in
attendance at the meeting.
(j) As used in this section, "meeting" includes any congregation
of a majority of the members of the board at the same time and place
to hear, discuss, or deliberate upon any item of business scheduled
to be heard by the board, except those matters that may be discussed
in executive session.

;)

LawrenceC1 (Georgia)
Posts: 480
Posted:
Fiona,

A board meeting is supposed to be for the board members to make and vote on motions. Most Bylaws say that other homeowners can attend a board meeting, but not contribute unless requested to do so by the President.

An "open forum" portion of the board meeting is time set aside when the homeowners in attendance are allowed to make comments and express concerns.

I agree with some of the earlier postings that say allowing homeowners to comment throughout the meeting is a good thing. Be sure that the President keeps things from getting out of control. Maintain the the pattern of motion, discussion, cloture, and vote. Move through the agenda in an orderly fashion.

RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
In California, "open Forum" is the law. Civil Code 1363.05(h)
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,044
Posted:
Fiona,

For my Board, when I open the floor up for comments (open forum) anyone may discuss anything they have that relates to the HOA. It does not matter if it's on the agenda or not.

At Annual meeting of the membership, I do the same thing but there is a definitive time frame for the open forum (10-30 min. depending on the agenda items). If there is a large number of people who wish to speak, a time limit is imposed or the Boards response is limited to let us check into it and get back to you. We try to give everyone a chance to speak who wants to and invite them to approach the board members individually after the meeting if they desire.
SusanB22 (California)
Posts: 5
Posted:
FionaC,

Is this your first bosrd meeting? If so, maybe you misunderstood the proceeding. Did the President actually state that no open fourm questions would be allowed? This sounds a little strange, is the Pres. new to the board? Seems some inoformation might be missing.
RobW (California)
Posts: 279
Posted:
Last night, I was at a Board meeting that began at 7:00 PM and ended at 10:30. (The last hour was an executive session.)

My opinion on this is that the Board needs to strike a balance between reaching out to the community to allow the individual members to develop their points of view "on the fly," and getting the business taken care of, which - after all - is what the Board members were elected to do.

We've tried some different approaches to homeowner input, and settled on having the first 30 minutes set aside for what the agenda calls "Homeowner Concerns." Any homeowner can bring anything to the attention of the Board during this period, and there are no rules (other than courtesy), and no format required.

After the Homeowner Concerns segment is over, the business portion of the Board meeting begins. There are pros and cons to this, of course, one pro being that people who have complaints and hostile speeches to deliver can say their pieces and leave. The con is that they never stay to the end of the Board meeting, and therefore never see how decisions that affect their lives are made.

As for allowing homeowners to speak all during the meeting, what we've seen is that meetings drag on interminably, with homeowners asking questions that they could easily have answered themselves by reading the Association documents (available for download on the HOA website), and the minutes of previous meetings (also available for download on the HOA website). This prevents the already overworked Board from conducting business efficiently, and leads to burnout, as well as increased costs when the property manager is forced to work overtime.

Somewhere there has to be a balance, and I think it depends on the particular HOA and mix of personalities involved as to what works and what doesn't.
JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RobW on 02/17/2011 12:10 PM

After the Homeowner Concerns segment is over, the business portion of the Board meeting begins. There are pros and cons to this, of course, one pro being that people who have complaints and hostile speeches to deliver can say their pieces and leave. The con is that they never stay to the end of the Board meeting, and therefore never see how decisions that affect their lives are made.


Hi Rob:

I wonder if it would work better if Homeowner Concerns is put at the end of a meeting for potentially needing to add an item to agenda for next board meeting. This way individuals will need to be there for the entire meeting, then hopefully will gain better understanding how HOA operates.
RobW (California)
Posts: 279
Posted:
Hi Janet,

A homeowner suggested this very thing, and last night, the Board tried it. What happened was that people with an axe to grind sat there and gradually lost patience, and then began to interrupt the meeting with vitriolic comments and questions. Eventually they, and other impatient homeowners, left early. One could argue that the burden was on them to stick it out until their turn, but on the other hand, if they did have valid concerns, no one got to hear them.

One philosophy I held to when I was the Board president was this, and I realize it's only my opinion:

Human beings have a responsibility to others to speak the truth as clearly and courteously as possible.

Human beings have a responsibility to themselves to hear the truth, no matter how it's delivered.

That philosophy has gotten me through more sticky problems than you could imagine, and has enabled me to facilitate solutions in otherwise hopeless situations.

Rob
JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
Hmmm ... I can see now each would have its pro's and con's. Nice to know you tried it and what the outcome was.

RobW (California)
Posts: 279
Posted:
I think we can safely use this online forum as an example of the complex dynamics involved in maintaining any sort of peaceful community.

People come to this forum - and it certainly could be described as open - for a wide range of reasons, and with a wide range of agendas. Sometimes it's clear what a discussion is actually about, while at other times, I scratch my head trying to read between the lines.

I think the one common denominator is that we all want to walk away with more of something than we had when we started. Maybe more information, more ammunition, more validation, or more peace of mind - whatever it is, the rest of the people in the discussion may never know what it was. That really describes the Board meeting I attended last night.

Rob
DanielH1 (California)
Posts: 482
Posted:
If your HOA has time allotted exclusively to Open Forum, it does help for a Board Member to help the speaker along.

Before I joined the Board, people would often ramble unimpeded for 10 or 20 minutes, returning to the same point multiple times, until they became exhausted and finally stopped talking. In some cases, people would often talk about nothing in particular or about things that bothered them.

When I joined the Board, I started interacting, prompting and summarizing people's points and that helped them say more and say it more quickly.

For me, it is rarely useful for a homeowner to engage in discussion during the agenda items. They don't have the info that the Board has in front of them so they don't have any info that a Board Member doesn't already have. Also, Board Members can address individuals directly during agenda items so, if they want or need input, Board Members can ask for it directly. Even so, I don't mind that homeowners participate in the meeting itself, just that it makes the meeting longer than necessary.
FionaC (California)
Posts: 212
Posted:
I guess my original post was misunderstood.
I previously attended monthly meetings which did allow for open session. This could be the time to ask if there was plans to do a project.. or offer input on ANY thing.

This last meeting, the president was VERY clear. They'd only allow statements regarding Agenda items only.

( Hence.. my issues with the president were saved for executive session.. she was seen bringing her dogs, and her neighbors dogs to several hoa functions... she assisted with making the rules.. which she herself broke regarding pets in our common areas, pool and clubhouse ) I didn't get any reaction, but the board was visually upset that I brought this up. I was told.. we will address it. Thank you for your concerns.
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
The presiding officer can acknowledge anyone at a meeting. If a member in the audience could have useful information, there is no reason to not allow that person to speak - at any time. This puts pressure on the presiding officer to choose wisely.

re: Fiona's dog issue. It seems she is having a hard time getting the board to deal with this "issue." There was no space in the agenda for her to bring this up, and she was frustrated.

She might have requested a slot under "new business." Board responses to the question of clarification about animals in common areas and the consequences would have been put into the minutes.

But I think the REAL issue is the preceived elevated position of board members in that they do not have to follow rules.
FionaC (California)
Posts: 212
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By SusanW1 on 02/18/2011 7:42 AM
The presiding officer can acknowledge anyone at a meeting. If a member in the audience could have useful information, there is no reason to not allow that person to speak - at any time. This puts pressure on the presiding officer to choose wisely.

re: Fiona's dog issue. It seems she is having a hard time getting the board to deal with this "issue." There was no space in the agenda for her to bring this up, and she was frustrated.

She might have requested a slot under "new business." Board responses to the question of clarification about animals in common areas and the consequences would have been put into the minutes.

But I think the REAL issue is the preceived elevated position of board members in that they do not have to follow rules.

As silly as this sounds. I suspect the President knew I was at this meeting for a reason. Our manager was well aware of the issue as I spoke to him previously. I suspect givng the nature of the relationship with out management company they the Pres and in fact the HOA BOD was aware of my concerns.

Fear not, the manager was pretty shocked about my concerns. He felt and confirmed that this will not be tolerated. Since this incident has been brought to light, my nieghbor, one of the other BOD who brought her dogs in the clubhouse doesn't even give the common hello in the elevator. Saying.. they are rather upset they were called upon the block like any other homeowner would be and now.. I am THE BAD PERSON.

Our annual election is in April. I am putting my name on the ballot again. This type of behavior is just ridiculous from someone that we intrust our funds with decisions with and has caused great concern in judgement by our HOS Prez and others. Just ridiculous.
SusanB22 (California)
Posts: 5
Posted:
Wow! There is a lot going on with you. So now you are mad because you turned people in who were breaking the rules and they are not saying "Hi!!" to you in the elevator. Didn't you think this would happen? I'm not defending the other peoples actions, but now you are miffed that they are mad. And to get back at them you are going to run for a spot on the Board? Through you own admission, you have a history of quitting the board once elected. Is this fair to the other home owners? I would not discourage anyone from becoming active on their board, we could use more help, but it should be for the right reasons.
FionaC (California)
Posts: 212
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By SusanB22 on 02/19/2011 7:23 PM
Wow! There is a lot going on with you. So now you are mad because you turned people in who were breaking the rules and they are not saying "Hi!!" to you in the elevator. Didn't you think this would happen? I'm not defending the other peoples actions, but now you are miffed that they are mad. And to get back at them you are going to run for a spot on the Board? Through you own admission, you have a history of quitting the board once elected. Is this fair to the other home owners? I would not discourage anyone from becoming active on their board, we could use more help, but it should be for the right reasons.

GIving the actions by the current board, yes. I am going to run for a spot. Rumor has it that several of the current board are not going to be running. There is unfinished business that need to be completed and the few other board members who plan running for election are new. SO, saying that along with my other little issues.. yes. I am running. Personally? I dont' think its right t support a self serving board. NO matter how lame the rule infractions are.. they have been broken.

thank you please close this thread.

ShaeB (California)
Posts: 1
Posted:
Our open forum is at the very beginning and is 30minutes. Members get 3 minutes each to address anything they want. After the 30 minutes we move to the live agenda where homeowners do not get to participate. This works great and the meeting moves right along. Occasionally the board will take a poll from the audience, but usually the meetings run super smooth...especially with this great new board we have.
RobW (California)
Posts: 279
Posted:
It really depends upon the mix of people at any given meeting, and what the issues are, but generally, I do believe it's important for the BOD to engage the homeowners in open forum, at least at some point in the meeting. If it gets out of hand, though, you really may need a sergeant-at-arms to get the meeting back on track.

Rob

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here