Quote:
Posted By SandyC1 on 12/02/2008 6:08 AM
RobertR1, the reason behind all of this "mess" is we have ONE person who has been and still is watching EVERY move and thing we do under a scope. Ouoting FL, statues, etc.. he sends his neighbor to record all meetings, I have no problem with that. I have to under Fl statue. Then goes home and desects the meeting 2-3 days later we are getting letters, about why or how we should do things. I and 3 others are not getting paid like a CEO!! We rae not lawyers , accounts, etc. neither is HE. But he is a shutin and all he does is look up things.He even sets deadlines for us to give him info he wants!
Sorry we recieve no pay for this and do as best the BOD can. He has now hired a lawyer, wants 600.00 enough. He can have the place, or pay us and we have to answer to him.
Bu the way he reads this site and has quoted that BOD "s get information so be all careful on what is said here...SANDYC1
We had a pain in the rear resident like this. They are control freaks and they feel they can disrupt and micro-manage.
One thing I recommended to our board president early on is to NOT get into verbal discussions with him. For one thing, it's never really about the alleged "topic" he wants to discuss anyway. He has a more toxic agenda, and there's really no way to suss it out, so don't even try.
We established a policy that ALL requests for information were to be in writing and would be responded to under OUR deadlines. That is, IF they were information requests that were legitimate and for which were had a responsibility to respond.
For example, if he wants to know how many delinquent accounts we have, we will provide that information, on OUR deadline, not his.
But if he wants to know WHY we made x decision and not y, then he would be referred to the minutes from the meeting at which it was discussed and discontinue the discussion.
If he wanted to know why we did NOT get a quote from XXX service, we would simply respond, in writing, that we obtained quotes from ZZZ Service, MMM Service and TTT Service and not get into a micromanaging discussion with him about it. Again. We will be brief, to the point, and courteous. We will NOT get into back-and-forth discussions or arguments.
If he wants to be THAT involved in the day-to-day operations of the association, then he must run for the board and be elected to a seat. Until then, we are NOT his employees, he is NOT our manager, and we have more important work to do than to babysit his ego.
If he points out mistakes that we have genuinely made (and lord knows, no one is perfect), then we thank him for his input and let him know we will address it appropriately. We then correct the error, if we can, but feel no more "obligation" or "responsibility" to "update" him on our actions. Again he is NOT our employer, and he is NOT our manager.
If he points out mistakes he THINKS we have made, which we HAVEN'T, we will still thank him for his input and let it go at that.
ALL in writing. . . . .