💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
Our Management Company has 'hinted' to one of recently elected board members that they may be increasing our maintenance fee for 2009. They are reviewing the budget.

The problem is that we are still under Declarant Control and the development which is 40 townhomes is not completed and now with the slow housing market and economy we are not sure when and if it will completed. Right now we have 24 townhomes built, one is the model and one is not finished. The Declarant (builder ownes 8 and rents 6 he ownes the model and the unfinished home). Four more homes are under construction, 2 are sold. Myself and my neighbor are on the Board, the other three members are the Declarant and his appointees.

Only 22 homes are paying monthly maintenance fees. The Declarant is paying the monthly maintenance fees on the homes he ownes and rents but not on the empty lots. The other board member who lives in the development is a financial analyst for a large corporation. He has found many discrepencies and overspending in the budget (Declarant relatives have all the landscaping, snow plowing, etc. contracts).

He has approached the managemnet company regarding putting out bids for contractors, however, the MC says that the contracts will be in place until 2010. I have spoken to many of the residents and they all say they will not pay an increase. My question is this, can we reject the budget even though the Declarant is in control?

Our CC&R's say we get control when 75 percent of the homes are built and sold to someone other than the Declarant or 7 years from when the CCR's were recorded with the state. Both are a long way off.

Should we be consulting an attorney????Any advice you can give me on this would be appreciated.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
First, not paying is not an option. Not paying will do nothing but put the homeowner at risk as the developer can, and probably will, place liens on the uncollected dues.

Also, as the declarant has control, and will for some time, then who he selects to fulfill the maintenance contracts is pretty much in his court.

It might be in the residents' best interest to form a "diplomatic delegation" to sit down with the developer and work to establish -- and articulate -- common goals and areas of agreement so that you can obtain more input to and communication from and with the developer.

Once you all establish and articulate those areas that are common and positive, then it should be easier to work through points of contention.

MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
I realize that we cannot "not pay" our maintenance fees, my question was can we reject an increase? We have asked in the past to meet with the builder but he refuses. We can try again, but I am not optimistic.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Well, you would certainly have to check your governing documents to see what amount the docs allow without membership vote.

Chances are, depending on the docs, that an increase IS allowed and NOT PAYING the increase will effectively be considered NOT PAYING THE ASSESSMENTS IN FULL, and you would still risk the liens, which now would include any penalties and legal fees.

MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
I am checking the docs now. In regards to your suggestion about meeting with the Builder (Delclarant) I did come across the following....

Special Meetings...The President shall call a special meeting of the Association is so directed by resolution of the Executive Board or upon a petition signed and presented to the Secretary by Unit Owners entitled to case at least 25% of the votes in the Association.

Does this mean the unit owners can have the President call a special meeting if we get a petition signed by 25% of the unit owners? in our case that would be 10.

SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
If the fees are increased, then the Declarent is also going to pay more. I can't see why he would want that. As suggested before, sit down with the Declarent and get the facts straight. It's only a rumor, right now.

In this economy, it's NOT a good idea for any company to raise rates. Just keeping the Status quo is being lucky enough!

P.S. WHAT contracts are until 2010?
KirkW1 (Texas)
Posts: 1,665
Posted:
If you are under contract, then the management company can only raise the fees in accordance with said contract. I would start by reading that contract.

If you have evidence that the money is being mis-used and or handled in such a way as to give undue benefit to the developer then I would draft a letter explaining to him that you see this evidence. Point out that his fiduciary duty requires him to act in the best interest of the association. Further point out that under state laws he can be held criminally liable as well as civilly liable. And that the D&O policy may not cover intentional violations of his duty, such as giving preferential treatment to his relatives in contracts for the association.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MaureenM1 on 09/27/2008 8:24 AM
I am checking the docs now. In regards to your suggestion about meeting with the Builder (Delclarant) I did come across the following....

Special Meetings...The President shall call a special meeting of the Association is so directed by resolution of the Executive Board or upon a petition signed and presented to the Secretary by Unit Owners entitled to case at least 25% of the votes in the Association.

Does this mean the unit owners can have the President call a special meeting if we get a petition signed by 25% of the unit owners? in our case that would be 10.


Maureen,

IMO, the unit owners would also include the developer. Your docs should state how many votes the developer is entitled to -- he is Class B membership and usually has more than one vote per lot owned. If the developer is still in control I'm sure he has the majority of the votes in the assn. Get used to the fact that as long as the developer is in control he pretty much runs the assn. Whatever he says, goes! I doubt very seriously the members have the right to reject the assessment increase. But, if the members do have that right it certainly would be spelled out in the CCRs.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here