💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

GeorgerwilliamsW (Indiana)
Posts: 975
Posted:
This is a great, thoughtful letter from Hilton Head (emphasis added).

From the Hilton Head Island Packet
http://www.islandpacket.com/opinion/letters/story/575654.html

Do you agree or disagree??


Our esteemed Charles Fraser pioneered the use of covenants as a value-adding feature of gated community development, now widely adapted internationally. But he often warned against too literal application and enforcement, reminding the zealous that judicious restraint in their application, tempered with discretion and wit, were required to avoid precluding the best along with the worst.

As an avid student of architecture, Fraser understood all too well what Jane Jacobs railed against 50 years ago in her critique of urban renewal -- that what we most admire was being destroyed in our very efforts to redevelop.

Fraser was especially concerned that cavalier cutting and pasting of his carefully worded restrictive language, while effective in pruning eyesores, could allow and even encourage these very heavy-handed tendencies.

It has proved to be a sticky business, applying and enforcing these covenants. But perhaps like democracy, it's the least worst system available. Over 30 years, I have observed (professionally) that the delicate business of exercising such judgment has a way of falling to those least suited -- those who are convinced they know what's best -- often to their own community's detriment. Not to belittle the volunteer, without whom no community can flourish, but the unfortunate result of governance by covenant, aside from bruised egos and general aggravation, often proves to be a vast pasteurization, forfeiting cultural and aesthetic diversity on its own altar.

Such seems the sad fate of Sterling Point's bottle tree.

Merrill Pasco

Hilton Head Island
KirkW1 (Texas)
Posts: 1,665
Posted:
Outside of the idea that the amateur status might have something to do with the problems, I would pretty much agree. I find it amazing the polarity of people in the idea of conformity versus non-conformity.

One extreme would have three hundred houses painted with no more then three colors. The other doesn't seem to get that a 10,000 sq foot replica of the Taj Mahal just doesn't seem to fit among the 300 ranch style houses.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
I'm not quite sure that I agree or disagree.

I will say, however, that I don't live in cookie-cutter development, nor does our community covenants require a "palette" for colors and/or styles.

There are some pretty narrow covenants, however, but not any that are difficult to live within.

But here's my comment, and it's just an observation:

If one has issues with the blandness that cookie-cutter communities with rigid restrictions regarding colors, et al, then why would one move into one and agree to live within the dictates of the documents?

And if the community evolves to the point where the members feel the documents are too restrictive, they generally have a remedy for that.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here