JimF2 (New Jersey)
Posts: 9
Posts: 9
Posted:
Hello everyone!
We are a 262 unit townhouse-style condo development that is roughly 95% built but is fully sold. Naturally we're beginning to think about the transition process from the developer.
Our current management company came as a "package deal" from our developer, and the community is not happy with them. As a board member, I am constantly amazed at how poorly they do their job. Because of all this, we've also begun looking for new management.
My question is this - should we wait for the transition process to complete before replacing our MC? I'd like to hear from people who have replaced theirs before their developer transition or were in a similar situation as us and decided to wait until after transition to replace their MC, and the pros and cons of each approach.
Our attorney has advised us that it's usually better to stick with the original management company during transition, since they're familiar with the developer and all of the existing issues. My theory is that the current MC is beholden to the developer, and wouldn't want to jeopardize their business relationship with the developer by pressing on certain issues, and that it would be best to have new eyes looking at everything.
Does anyone have any experience or advice they can share?
Thanks,
-JF
We are a 262 unit townhouse-style condo development that is roughly 95% built but is fully sold. Naturally we're beginning to think about the transition process from the developer.
Our current management company came as a "package deal" from our developer, and the community is not happy with them. As a board member, I am constantly amazed at how poorly they do their job. Because of all this, we've also begun looking for new management.
My question is this - should we wait for the transition process to complete before replacing our MC? I'd like to hear from people who have replaced theirs before their developer transition or were in a similar situation as us and decided to wait until after transition to replace their MC, and the pros and cons of each approach.
Our attorney has advised us that it's usually better to stick with the original management company during transition, since they're familiar with the developer and all of the existing issues. My theory is that the current MC is beholden to the developer, and wouldn't want to jeopardize their business relationship with the developer by pressing on certain issues, and that it would be best to have new eyes looking at everything.
Does anyone have any experience or advice they can share?
Thanks,
-JF