Get 6 months of free community web site hosting from Community123.com!
Thursday, January 08, 2009
Banking Solutions for Community Associations (NCB) (National Bank)
Finance repair projects or deposit reserve accounts with NCB, an industry leader with over 25 years experience. Learn More…
HOA Websites by Community123.com (National Community Website Provider)
We built HOATalk and we'll build your community website for free!  Click here for information on a free trial website.
IHG Insurance (National Insurance Provider)
Providing Community Association Insurance for over 25 years: D&O Liability, Crime Products, Umbrella Coverage and Property Manager's Errors & Omissions Liability.
Community Associations Network (National HOA Reference Library)
News, articles and blogs about condos/HOA's
Only members have access to all features.
Click here to join HOATalk for Free! Members click here to login and access all features.
Subject: Selective Inforcement of Rules?
Prev Next
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author Messages
NicoleO4


Posts:0


07/23/2008 10:52 PM  
Big question.

Our board has reviewed our list of infractions from this last month. One issue was a homeowner who has an unapproved fence on her patio. It's not in our rules nor is there any noted meeting minutes approving this.

Saying that the fence this lady has on her patio is not unlike an item I would like to place on mine for several reasons. Privacy, heat and sun issues.

The original bamboo fencing as mentioned is clearly against our current set of rules.. unless we ammend them.

But... the homeowner's unit faces a hotel.. and they claim it gives her privacy... and the board majority does not want to cite this woman on this issue despite it being clearly against the rules... and they know this. They feel that this should be "an exception".

I asked if I could put up the same bamboo fencing on my patio and they said NO! I also stated that my unit faces apartments that gives me no privacy and the heat issue.. the deck is hot enough to burn bare feet... they said NO.

I told them that I can take legal action against the HOA for selective enforcement of rules and that I will be buying this unapproved yet approved fencing.

Can anyone give me the steps I need to do to pursue this?
SusanW1
(Michigan)

Posts:2316


07/24/2008 4:54 AM  
If your Board is authorized (has the power) to grant exceptions to the CCRs, then that's what SHE got and YOUR petition is not enough of a special circumstance.

While it may seem as unequal, the Board may think that ALL units facing the sun may approach them for the same variance.

NicoleO4


Posts:0


07/24/2008 6:45 AM  
Susan.. no offense but no.. the board does not have the power to grant authorizations. I am on the board, have served on it for a few years. Ths issue is that there are NO minutes, written authorization of this knowing infraction yet the board WILL NOT enforce the rules that apply to everyone. There are 10 units facing this same HOTEL that do not have the bamboo fencing up.

( homeowner is an old board member and "friends" with several board members including myself. )



I think that I am going to ask my atty to draft a requests letter so that I may also have the same fencing allowd to that in unit. I did ask verbally for this and it was a majority NO you may not.

any other suggestions?
MicheleD
(Kentucky)

Posts:1863


07/24/2008 7:59 AM  
I respectfully beg to differ on your assessment that the board cannot "waive" certain requirements.


They should at a minimum, to protect themselves and the resident, put all approvals, denials, and/or waivers in writing.

However, having the ability to "approve" or "disapprove" something, very often allows for the entity to "waive" certain conditions, say, of materials, for example, if deemed appropriate in the case at hand.

The ability to "waive" certain things are not expressly written into our CC&Rs, but neither are they expressly denied to us, either.

So, for example, our outbuilding guidelines specify that the outbuilding has to be placed within a certain number of feet from the main building. If the applicant's lot size and/or shape does not allow for that, a reasonable, and fair, Arch Committee could "waive" that requirement and establish a placement on the lot that is appropriate for the particular applicant.

But the board must be careful not to "waive" indiscriminately or arbitrarily, either, or they could risk diluting their standards.

Even so, lots of CC&Rs also have a provision such as this to allow for some discretion on the part of the board:

"Section 7. Board's Determination Binding. In the event of any dispute or disagreement between any owners relating to the property subject to this Declaration, or any questions of interpretation or application of the provisions of this Declaration or the Bylaws, the determination thereof by the Board shall be final and binding on each and all such owners."

I still agree, however, that they should put the "waiver" or "approval" of the bamboo fence IN WRITING.

MicheleD
(Kentucky)

Posts:1863


07/24/2008 8:03 AM  
But please note, if your documents say there is no approval process or state that the board or an Architectural or other similar committee cannot approve or disapprove lot improvements, such as fences, etc, then that would be odd to say the least.

What is the wording of your governing documents that disallows the board or a committee of some kind from allowing fences or lot improvements such as that?

I would be interested in how something like that is written.
hoatalk


Posts:490


07/24/2008 8:24 AM  
NicoleO4: You mentioned in another thread that you are on the Board. Can you explain further what is going on here? You want to sue the HOA of which you are Board member? Please expand on your role in the HOA and your working relationship with the current Board.

HOATalk.com, A free service of Community123.com
Provider of Upscale Community Websites
CLICK HERE to get a FREE trial community website
*See legal notice below (end of page) or go to www.hoatalk.com/legal
DonnaS
(Tennessee)

Posts:2948


07/24/2008 9:43 AM  

Nicole,

First of all, if you want to work this out, you need to unposture yourself from the "fight" position. You already have said-- "I told them that I can take legal action against the HOA for selective enforcement of rules and that I will be buying this unapproved yet approved fencing". That was your first mistake. That was a threat no matter what you might call it.

The Bamboo fencing is not allowed according to your Docs. Period. You nor anyone else can use this type. What can you use? You said that it is not in our rules" ?? What does that mean, the type of fencing allowed? I cannot grasp exactly what you can or cannot use and where is it stated?

The Bamboo fence on the neighbors patio was not approved. Make her take it down if it is in violation. Set some type of standard to have all of the fences alike. There should be no exceptions. So she will get mad but someone needs to get all of you on the same page(fence) The Board cannot just allow the non allowed fences for her or you or anyone. Agreed that you all should have a fence but they asthetically should all match. This is an ARC issue and obviously there are no written standards for your community.

Are they selectively enforcing against you? No. They are just denying you something which is different. There is no enforcement because there is no violation.

NicoleO4


Posts:0


07/24/2008 10:32 AM  
Hi Donna,
My conversation with my board was such that when the infraction of the uanpproved fencing was brought up and they denied a correction letter it opened up the subject for discussion in our executive session.

We have wrought iron bars on our balconies. This allow an open area of about 10 inches from bar to bar. We had at a certain time misc hodge podge stuff like plastic lattice, chicken wire, bamboo fencing. In 2004 we had a homeowner who went over board and enclosed her balcony and lots of complaints from others we decided as a community to allow fine mesh wire to be allowed on balconies for safey issues ( pets and kids could fit through if small enough) It was passed, put into our rules ( myself and another board member who still serve ok'd this ) and made it the rule and regs that this was the ONLY approved fencing to be allowed to provide uniformity ect. and it it clearly outlined in our docs.

Saying that the fact the the board knowingly admits that the unit with the bad unapproved fencing is present. There are no minutes or written approval for this, but they will NOT enforce the rules in place WHen questioned as to why one board member stated they always allowed this kind of partitian or fence for privacy issues. There are NO minutes or written approval for this. When I asked if I can have board approval for the same as I also face an apartment building ect they said NO, made the comment that I have a vedetta against the homeonwer and that they will not approve my request.

So I have asked that my request be put in our minutes and I am currently having my own personal atty review our rules, regs and cc&r's as he is submitting a letter to our board requesting that I be allowed to erect the same exact fence..... that is all. For my own privacy I would like the same approval granted to my own balcony. The fact is there are no documents supporting thier idea of an approved exception. Nowhere. SO I am seeking to get the ball in motion and either get my fence approved the proper way...
DonnaS
(Tennessee)

Posts:2948


07/24/2008 11:20 AM  

Nicole,

That si what you need to do--and that is to get a standard written as to type and materials to be used. Being on the Board, you should excuse yourself from any vote because of a conflict of interest. How many Board members do you have? Hopefully as long as you have your attorney reviewing your documents, he can explain it to your Board, that they need some uniformity on the fences. That should have been in your original documents but obviously it was not.
DanielL2
(Florida)

Posts:4


07/24/2008 1:56 PM  
Often in Docs it is stated that any member of the HOA has the right to enforce the Covenants & Restrictions. It sounds like she is directly in violation. Give her something in writing that gives a time frame for removal. She may comply, and you can be done with it. Or...
What we do is send the ARC request form and ask that the homeowner follow the proper procedure. It sounds like the Board plans to approve the improvement. If they do, in writing, it will be more trouble for you than it is worth to fight it.
DanielL2
(Florida)

Posts:4


07/24/2008 2:00 PM  
After reading your last post. It would be good if she submitted a request and was approved. Maybe you should fill it out for her and tell her to review, sign, and submit it. Then you'll have much more support to install the same.
SusanW1
(Michigan)

Posts:2316


07/24/2008 2:15 PM  
From your description:

"the homeowner's unit faces a hotel.. and they claim it gives her privacy... and the board majority does not want to cite this woman on this issue despite it being clearly against the rules... and they know this. They feel that this should be "an exception"."

it sounds like this person DOES have a special circumstances. The Board's fault is not having this entire thing in writing in the minutes - to protect itself from charges just like the one you are considering! As it is now, it seems like preferential service to one unit, and denial to another.

1) the Board needs to officially grant a variance to this person, based on this very special configuration of the porch facing the hotel.

2) then you can submit your request and the cards will fall where they may. BUT - unless you have an EQUAL exceptional circumstance, don't bet on getting approval.

3) Sounds like your CCRs need updating AND the badly designed (and probably non compliant porch rails) need to be brought up to code.
KirkW1
(Texas)

Posts:1190


07/24/2008 2:19 PM  
If you are on the board, then you should make a motion to enforce the rule. At that point it belongs in the minutes regardless of what happens (even if it fails for lack of a second). If they don't put that in the minutes then you really should consider your continued position on the board since you are also in the perilous position of a defendant.

You may also want to check into laws regarding recording. Some states require all people in the recording to agree to be recorded. Others do not. I have no idea about yours.

You should also look for a solution that serves everyone. I would think that a fence at the property line would be in order and would give everyone privacy. As for protection from the sun, I would recommend solar screens, and/or film on the windows. Perhaps a full view storm door with solar film applied (need not be dark to block most of the hear).
BradP
(Kansas)

Posts:1742


07/24/2008 2:19 PM  
Susan:

She stated earlier that her unit faces apartments, wouldn't she then also qualify for this "special exemption?" I think it bogus the board approved this and then denied yours. They set a precedent by considering privacy, now they should deal with it appropriately.
TonyM3
(Arizona)

Posts:140


07/24/2008 2:36 PM  
It could have something to do with the height, distance and view orientation of the respective buildings (hotel & apartment).
NicoleO4


Posts:0


07/24/2008 3:40 PM  
Tony.. don't think that height or variances have anything to do with this. Honestly the neighboring apartaments are even closer the the mentioned hotel to the other woman.

I am seeking legal counsel on presenting my case. The denial of my original request and the fact that they approved this lady will be in our minutes. Our board on a whole was not present last night. We had quarum with 3 members and therefore the others did not vote. I however will be presenting my request for approval with my atty in a letter form. He has our rules, regs and CCrs and bylaws.. and nothing has been approved in minutes..

Our board will either have to approve mine request or have this lady remove hers. My atty is very very interested in pursuing this as the two board members who did not ok this offered the rational that they always allowed these things but not officially.. ... that quote is in our minutes..

)
EllenS1
(Florida)

Posts:400


07/25/2008 7:43 PM  
DonnaS,

I could't agree with you more. A threat of legal action is ridiculous and makes working out things so much more difficult. There are so many more options but when going to your attorney is mentioned it just creates gridlock. I've been in the legal profession for over 25 years and almost laugh when folks say they are going to sue...oooh" big scare...Of course you can sue for anything..that doesn't mean you will win. And this threat is usually before they find out what the cost of a lawsuit involves. Try working it out and if you do want to pursue legal action there is no reason to warn your adversaries..just do it or not.
NicoleO4


Posts:0


07/25/2008 7:59 PM  
Hello Ellen,

Legal action was not that of me creating a suit towards the HOA but rather use my atty as a tool to creat some communication and a valid request for my fence in question. I need to let you know that the vote on this is literally 50/50 due to one board member's unit hitting forclosure this last week we have an EVEN number of votes. Upon review of all documents including a huge pile of meeting minutes... we can't go back 20+ years due to missing records.... there is nothing at all that allows this "exception" and my atty and his staff all stated a hefty "no" when asked if what she has up is found documented anywhere.... the only information that we have of anything being ok'd is the 20+ year homeowner board member who states" we always allowed this on that side of the building.. she is just the first to do this in many years. " Thats fine but no documentation supports this. My request is to have the same and I am pursuing this as I see fitt.


The situation as reviewed by atty ( not for suing, but for letter writing and to be well versed on my request) for a request for the same consideration of the bamboo fence.

We also today got an email from our President who could not make a motion on this obvously but as it reads.

After reading Davis-Sterling 1345(a) ( I hope) is there an agreement to enforce our governing documents? I can say if they are not enforced as currently written with current violations noted, you must remember that any homeowner may take Court or Alternative Dispute Resolution action against the HOA for not enforcing the governing documents. I.E. A homeowner can commence legal action for the Board not enforcing this current rule.
A homeowner can also commence legal action against a homeowner to enforce CC&R's only.
Either way, we appear to be in a situation where we have a current violation and should be wary of not taking action.

She is well aware of what I am doing and supports my attempt at receiving true non partiality when it comes to rule enforcement. As minor as this sounds to many, it frankly scares me a bit that our last years board ignored the flower plants that are also clearly a infraction on one of the units cited this month. "He use to also be a board member and he is the one in foreclosure.. ) His plants hang on the wrought iron fence.. and our rules in the little hand book we are sent out each year clearly staten. '"Nothing shall be hung or drapped over wrought iron fences on any and all balconies... his plants have hooks and hang our and on the outside "

I do not believe that these over sights are "accidents"....

MicheleD
(Kentucky)

Posts:1863


07/25/2008 8:27 PM  
Guess you "gott'em" eh?
NicoleO4


Posts:0


07/25/2008 8:46 PM  
Got them to enforce rules universally? I hope so.
NicoleO4


Posts:0


07/25/2008 8:46 PM  
Got them to enforce rules universally? I hope so.
MicheleD
(Kentucky)

Posts:1863


07/26/2008 5:57 AM  
No, you played "gotchya"!

How dare someone have flowers drape over a wrought iron fence.

Good sleuthing. Now hold their feet to the fire!

Yup yup. Time to crack down on those blatant renegade flower hangers.

I truly hope they're running scared now.
RogerB
(Colorado)

Posts:3725


07/26/2008 6:10 AM  
Posted By NicoleO4 on 07/23/2008 10:52 PM
Big question.

Our board has reviewed our list of infractions from this last month. One issue was a homeowner who has an unapproved fence on her patio. It's not in our rules nor is there any noted meeting minutes approving this.

Saying that the fence this lady has on her patio is not unlike an item I would like to place on mine for several reasons. Privacy, heat and sun issues.

The original bamboo fencing as mentioned is clearly against our current set of rules.. unless we ammend them.

But... the homeowner's unit faces a hotel.. and they claim it gives her privacy... and the board majority does not want to cite this woman on this issue despite it being clearly against the rules... and they know this. They feel that this should be "an exception".

I asked if I could put up the same bamboo fencing on my patio and they said NO! I also stated that my unit faces apartments that gives me no privacy and the heat issue.. the deck is hot enough to burn bare feet... they said NO.

I told them that I can take legal action against the HOA for selective enforcement of rules and that I will be buying this unapproved yet approved fencing.

Can anyone give me the steps I need to do to pursue this?




Nicole, I just read this plus the rest of the thread. My advise is DEFINITELY DO NOT have your attorney contact your Board at this time. This could create a barrier to achieving your desired result. I would determine if the existing fence was approved by your architectural committee (ARC). If so, they should have created a wavier to the existing restriction. You could present that wavier to your ARC and ask for a similar one for a similar reason. If no approval was given, they should have received a violation notice and been required to remove the fence. If no violation notification was provided or such notice was not enforced within a defined legally established time limit, then it is too late for the Board to legally force its removal.

Now back to your request. Review your Declaration. It probably states something to the effect that an existing modification does not require the ARC to approve similar modifications in the future. So your best bet is to try to establish, in a friendly manner, that you too need a fence just as your neighbor needs their fence. IOW "honey tastes better the vinegar".

Roger Borcherding
Official HOATalk.com Sponsor
DARCO Property Management (Colorado)
(303) 925-0150 
Email Roger at this address.
*See legal notice below (end of page) or go to www.hoatalk.com/legal
NicoleO4


Posts:0


07/26/2008 8:08 AM  
Posted By RogerB on 07/26/2008 6:10 AM
Posted By NicoleO4 on 07/23/2008 10:52 PM
Big question.

Our board has reviewed our list of infractions from this last month. One issue was a homeowner who has an unapproved fence on her patio. It's not in our rules nor is there any noted meeting minutes approving this.

Saying that the fence this lady has on her patio is not unlike an item I would like to place on mine for several reasons. Privacy, heat and sun issues.

The original bamboo fencing as mentioned is clearly against our current set of rules.. unless we ammend them.

But... the homeowner's unit faces a hotel.. and they claim it gives her privacy... and the board majority does not want to cite this woman on this issue despite it being clearly against the rules... and they know this. They feel that this should be "an exception".

I asked if I could put up the same bamboo fencing on my patio and they said NO! I also stated that my unit faces apartments that gives me no privacy and the heat issue.. the deck is hot enough to burn bare feet... they said NO.

I told them that I can take legal action against the HOA for selective enforcement of rules and that I will be buying this unapproved yet approved fencing.

Can anyone give me the steps I need to do to pursue this?




Nicole, I just read this plus the rest of the thread. My advise is DEFINITELY DO NOT have your attorney contact your Board at this time. This could create a barrier to achieving your desired result. I would determine if the existing fence was approved by your architectural committee (ARC). If so, they should have created a wavier to the existing restriction. You could present that wavier to your ARC and ask for a similar one for a similar reason. If no approval was given, they should have received a violation notice and been required to remove the fence. If no violation notification was provided or such notice was not enforced within a defined legally established time limit, then it is too late for the Board to legally force its removal.

Now back to your request. Review your Declaration. It probably states something to the effect that an existing modification does not require the ARC to approve similar modifications in the future. So your best bet is to try to establish, in a friendly manner, that you too need a fence just as your neighbor needs their fence. IOW "honey tastes better the vinegar".





Roger thank you for your response.

Back to what I have been saying all along. No, this "fence" was never approved. It's been up for about a year now, and there are no previous, current meeting minutes that refelct any approval anywhere. The gal that has the fence has told me in the past that her freind the old president told her it was ok to put this up. Nobody will say anything... that sir makes me think that this also was put up withouth the appropriate trail that one must do in order to have proper approval. There are currently 10 other homeowners throughout the property who wish to do the same with a fence as well. I am just the first one to officially ask, be turend down and I will be following through. Our building is not being having the simple rules we jhave being inforced universally. I have some outside support on the pursuing of this item. I am definatly not alone.

I also don't think that mean or sarcastic remarks in regards to my situation makes me feel very comfortable in this forum especially when it's coming from a supposed atty. ( Not you Roger )
NicoleO4


Posts:0


07/26/2008 8:10 AM  
Posted By MicheleD on 07/26/2008 5:57 AM
No, you played "gotchya"!

How dare someone have flowers drape over a wrought iron fence.

Good sleuthing. Now hold their feet to the fire!

Yup yup. Time to crack down on those blatant renegade flower hangers.

I truly hope they're running scared now.





Are you for real? I myself can't help but think why was this comment to me necessary. Do you feel like a big wig now Chief? I myself don't appreciate this especially since you claim you are an attorney. I would hate to be your client... how embarassing.
MicheleD
(Kentucky)

Posts:1863


07/26/2008 11:18 AM  
Posted By NicoleO4 on 07/26/2008 8:10 AM


Are you for real? I myself can't help but think why was this comment to me necessary. Do you feel like a big wig now Chief? I myself don't appreciate this especially since you claim you are an attorney. I would hate to be your client... how embarassing.





Not embarrassing at all.

You are the one playing "gotchya" in order to bolster your position of alleged "selective enforcement."

I defy anyone anywhere, by the way, to locate any post on any forum I post on where I have implied, much less stated, in any way, shape or form that I am or was or am hoping to be an attorney.

You want to get a fence put up. One that may not pass muster. You want to put the screws in tighter to press your position.

So you are doing what many residents do when they want to get their way, if the documents don't grant them their way automatically: attempt to play "gotchya" for alleged "selective enforcement" on the board members or former board members.

In some cases, there is validity to that action, and if the board has been lax and selective, then by all means call them out on it, in the appropriate venue and with the appropriate authority and documentation.

I'm a stalwart believer that boards should to the very best of their ability enforce fairly and across the board.

Your case against inconsistent enforcement of fencing is a strong one and is a great place to start and will require a lot of homework and legwork in and of itself.

If, however, your case of a pattern of inconsistent, preferential or prejudicial enforcement rests on a former board member who has vegetation draping his wrought iron fence, I'm afraid a judge would find your position somewhat weak.

Seriously. You don't need to be embarrassed about it. Just focus on the more blatant, egregious, and flagrant patterns of enforcement abuse and your case would be immeasurably stronger.

Yes, all violations are the same, in the long run, but a judge is more likely to consider your position when the pattern of abuse of enforcement is something a bit more problematic than flowers draping a wrought iron fence.

GlenL
(Ohio)

Posts:1466


07/26/2008 3:02 PM  
Posted By NicoleO4 on 07/24/2008 10:32 AM

We have wrought iron bars on our balconies. This allow an open area of about 10 inches from bar to bar. We had at a certain time misc hodge podge stuff like plastic lattice, chicken wire, bamboo fencing. In 2004 we had a homeowner who went over board and enclosed her balcony and lots of complaints from others we decided as a community to allow fine mesh wire to be allowed on balconies for safey issues ( pets and kids could fit through if small enough) It was passed, put into our rules ( myself and another board member who still serve ok'd this ) and made it the rule and regs that this was the ONLY approved fencing to be allowed to provide uniformity ect. and it it clearly outlined in our docs.



Nicole, seeing as California is probably the most over regulated state in the union I find it hard to believe that a 10 inch wide opening which children could easily squeeze through would be allowed on a deck. We just rebuilt half of the decks in our community and had to reduce the opening space from 4 1/2 inches which was code when they were originally built to the new standard of 4 inches. You might want to check with the local building department to see if these railings are even allowed to begin with.
NicoleO4


Posts:0


07/26/2008 3:16 PM  
This building was built in 1980. Not too sure if that goes back far enough that this was an "oversight"
GlenL
(Ohio)

Posts:1466


07/26/2008 3:20 PM  
All it would take to find out is a phone call to the building dept.
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Forums > Homeowner Association > HOA Discussions > Selective Inforcement of Rules?



General Legal Notice:  The content of forum messages are from the posting member and have not been reviewed nor endorsed by HOATalk.com.  Messages posted by HOATalk or other members are for informational purposes only, are not legal or professional advice and do not constitute an attorney-client relationship.  Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.  HOATalk is not a licensed attorney, CPA, tax advisor, financial advisor or any other licensed professional.  HOATalk accepts ads from sponsors but does not verify sponsor qualifications nor endorse/guarantee any sponsor's product or service.
HindmanSanchez Legal Notice:  (For messages posted by HindmanSanchez) This message has been prepared by HindmanSanchez for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Members of HOATalk.com should not act on this information without seeking professional counsel. Please do not send us confidential information unless you speak with one of our attorneys and get authorization to send that information to us. If you wish to initiate possible representation, please contact an attorney in our firm. Our attorneys are licensed to practice law in the state of Colorado only.

Legal Notice For Messages Posted by Sponsoring Attorneys: This message has been prepared by the sponsoring attorney for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Readers of HOATalk.com should not act on this information without seeking professional counsel. Please do not send any sponsoring attorney confidential information unless you speak with the sponsoring attorney or an attorney from the sponsoring attorney’s firm and get authorization to send that information to them. If you wish to initiate possible representation, please contact an attorney in the firm of the sponsoring attorney. Sponsoring attorneys that post messages here are licensed to practice law in a specific state or states as indicated in their message signature or sponsor’s profile page. (NOTE: A ‘sponsoring attorney’ is an attorney that is a HOATalk.com official sponsor and is identified as such in the posted message or on our sponsor page.)

Copyright HOA Talk.com ( Homeowners Association Discussions )   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement