|
| Saturday, October 11, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| IHG Insurance (National Insurance Provider) |
| Providing Community Association Insurance for over 25 years: D&O Liability, Crime Products, Umbrella Coverage and Property Manager's Errors & Omissions Liability. |
|
| Reserve Fund Resources (National Reserve Planning Tools) |
| If you’re a BOD Member, Planner, or PM you’ll want our offerings. Many are FREE. Plus, there’s our “Essentials” book, and software to keep your funds healthy. Learn More… |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
|
| Author |
Messages |
|
DetriaW (Colorado)
Posts:2
 |
| 07/10/2008 11:13 AM |
|
I have a question about HB 1135 that took effect July 1. Can the HOA or Home owner still request mediation if a situation took place before the new amendments? Please see attachment. See page 3 section 2(a) Thanks, D. |
Attachment: 1710134734071.pdf
|
|
|
|
KirkW1 (Texas)
Posts:917
 |
| 07/10/2008 11:29 AM |
|
I would say that if you have a conflict, you can certainly request mediation. That being said, the law doesn't require mediation, it merely encourages such and requires that all HOAs have a policy on such. I don't know why the HOA should not accept an offer of mediation. As the law states, it is typically cheaper and faster then the courts. |
|
|
|
|
DetriaW (Colorado)
Posts:2
 |
| 07/10/2008 11:53 AM |
|
Yes, I know that the it is encouraged. If you look at the attachment, I was wondering if it could still be requested by one party since this particular situation had taken place before July 1. The new language states "agreement of the parties" instead of either party to the controversy. If I'm understanding this correctly, it's stating it did not have to be a mutual decision, now it has to be. D. |
|
|
|
|
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts:3657
 |
| 07/10/2008 1:46 PM |
|
Detria, the answer is yes. HB 1135 amended CCIOA Section 38-33.3-124 which ONLY ENCOURAGES alternative dispute resolution encouraged BUT REQUIRES HOAs to have a policy statement on ADR. If both parties agree to mediation that is the way to go, either before or after July 1. However, if one party is not interested in going to mediation it would be a waste of time and money since without agreement to mediation by both parties the outcome would not be legally enforceable unless both parties signed an agreed upon written decision. |
|
Roger Borcherding Official HOATalk.com Sponsor DARCO Property Management (Colorado) (303) 925-0150  *See legal notice below (end of page) or go to www.hoatalk.com/legal |
|
|
JeanneK3 (Maryland)
Posts:120
 |
| 07/10/2008 2:02 PM |
|
Roger: In Maryland no mediation is legally enforceable. It is just a method to bring two parties together with a trained mediator to help them work out their differences. Are you saying that in Colorado it mediation really means binding arbitration? Jeanne |
|
|
|
|
|
| You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
|
ActiveForums 3.6
General Legal Notice: The content of forum messages are from the posting member and have not been reviewed nor endorsed by HOATalk.com. Messages posted by HOATalk or other members are for informational purposes only, are not legal or professional advice and do not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel. HOATalk is not a licensed attorney, CPA, tax advisor, financial advisor or any other licensed professional. HOATalk accepts ads from sponsors but does not verify sponsor qualifications nor endorse/guarantee any sponsor's product or service. HindmanSanchez Legal Notice: (For messages posted by HindmanSanchez) This message has been prepared by HindmanSanchez for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Members of HOATalk.com should not act on this information without seeking professional counsel. Please do not send us confidential information unless you speak with one of our attorneys and get authorization to send that information to us. If you wish to initiate possible representation, please contact an attorney in our firm. Our attorneys are licensed to practice law in the state of Colorado only. Legal Notice For Messages Posted by Sponsoring Attorneys: This message has been prepared by the sponsoring attorney for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Readers of HOATalk.com should not act on this information without seeking professional counsel. Please do not send any sponsoring attorney confidential information unless you speak with the sponsoring attorney or an attorney from the sponsoring attorney’s firm and get authorization to send that information to them. If you wish to initiate possible representation, please contact an attorney in the firm of the sponsoring attorney. Sponsoring attorneys that post messages here are licensed to practice law in a specific state or states as indicated in their message signature or sponsor’s profile page. (NOTE: A ‘sponsoring attorney’ is an attorney that is a HOATalk.com official sponsor and is identified as such in the posted message or on our sponsor page.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|