💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

KarenS11 (Florida)
Posts: 148
Posted:
Scenario- Board has regular monthly meetings,same time,same place, same day each month. Board has a huge agenda to vote on involving $$ issues. President is told that two of the members can not attend, leaving a quroum of three. And the President wants to cancel the meeting....
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Karen,

I commend the President for wanting to insure that the entire Board is present for this "huge agenda" involving lots of membership dollars unless there was some urgency which could not wait. Summertime is very difficult to get everyone present for meetings. I would do the same thing for my Board.
KirkW1 (Texas)
Posts: 1,665
Posted:
If it happens regularly, then you may want to look into the documents. Ours allow the other board members to dismiss a person for two unexcused absences.
NicoleO4 (California)
Posts: 160
Posted:
I would only be concerned if this was a trend. Otherwise the best decisions are made with the whole board present.
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
Why a "huge" agenda this time of the year? Tell us what your Board's calendar is.

We have Annual Meeting and elections in May; budget due for approval in July. Our fiscal year ends April 30.
KarenS11 (Florida)
Posts: 148
Posted:
We have some pressing issues that we did not get to last month BC the president refused to notice a special meeting that the board had voted to hold, instead taking the two contract issues that were to be heard at the special meeting up at the board meeting. She did this independently.

These contracts account for 70% of our budget and they need to be resolved. One of the contracts is up for renewal and we have gotten another bid that is 55% less than our exisiting vendor. We share this contract with two other HOAs and must vote and then get the info to them so that they can make their decision before the end of the month.

Also had an ARC issue last month that may be headed to litgation. Vote needed on what action to take. Another item that was not heard involves a decision on imposing a user fee that would reduce our budget by 5%. We meet in a public building and only had two hours for the meeting.

Another agenda item that we did not get to include one involving a new city fee and we have until the end of the month to file an appeal. This affects every resident's personal fees, as well. If we appeal and win, the association will get a credit every year. The residents will need to know whether to pay or file an appeal by the end of the month if we decide to appeal.

We also have our budget meeting in September and need to put a finance committee in place and set up a workshop for resident input. The association has not been deliberative about the budget in the past, accepting the PM's budget without question. We traditionally do not have a board meeting in July, but I think that with all that we have before us (I've only outlined the matters that have time constraints.), we need to break with tradition. The president thinks that we do not need monthly meetings.

In short, we are paying for the decision not to hold that special meeting. While it would be good to have the full board at this meeting. The two of us who will not be there can provide our input in advance of the meeting. I trust those who will be there to take our thoughts into account and then vote in the best interest of the association and owners.
CharlesW1 (Georgia)
Posts: 826
Posted:
KarenS11,

I certainly don’t mean ANY disrespect. However, (as previously stated), it’s nearly impossible to have ALL in attendance at a monthly meetings (various time constraints) regardless of where, the meeting is being held or its time. As long as quorum is established, the meeting can and MUST proceed, that is what needs to happen! That would be in the best interest of the entire community. IMHO.

I’m the Vice President on our board and our President (as yours does) continues to feel as though ALL must be present. I however DON'T. Eventhough, we only have a three member board. Only two are required to establish quorum to conduct any business or to resolve particular items on the agenda. We have done this the past two months. Certainly, not preferred but, sometimes necessary! The president and I were the ONLY two, out of three, present. Monthly meetings (IMO) are most definitely necessary. There is soooooo much that needs to be discussed throughout the month. Unfortunately, even monthly meetings sometimes aren’t often enough.

As KirkW1 had posted I highly suggest thoroughly reading your governing documents, many time found in the by-laws, for a covenant that stipulates such action. Ours too states that the remaining board members can dismiss any other board member after three unexcused absences. We are currently pounding the thought of notify this particular board member and reminding him of his prior commitment as a board member within the association.

Business has and will/should be conducted, when ever quorum is established. However, I feel that this particular person (board member) shouldn’t have their cake and eat it too. Essentially, requiring the board member to attend the monthly meetings on a more regular basis and fulfilling their role as a board member or resign!

Best of luck to your board.

Chuck W.

Charles E. Wafer Jr.
AnnaD2 (Florida)
Posts: 960
Posted:
Karen, in Florida a Board member may not vote by proxie on an issue at a meeting that you're unable to attend. So making your feelings known before the meeting does no good. But the State Statutes DO allow you to "attend" a meeting by "speaker phone". So if you can't be there in person, your voice and your vote can still be counted this way.
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KarenS11 on 06/21/2008 4:58 PM
Scenario- Board has regular monthly meetings,same time,same place, same day each month. Board has a huge agenda to vote on involving $$ issues. President is told that two of the members can not attend, leaving a quroum of three. And the President wants to cancel the meeting....

Karen, read and comply with your By-laws.

If your By-laws require regular monthly Board meetings then the meeting should not be cancelled. If there is a quorum the meeting should be held and business conducted as usual. If there is not a quorum the meeting can not be called to order but it can be rescheduled.

If the By-laws do not require the meeting to be held then the President can cancel or change the date in accordance with the By-laws.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Karen,

One other very important thing to remember is that the open meeting laws must be upheld (FL does have this requirement, right?). I know my board posts the meeting schedule in our quarterly newsletter as we do not have a clubhouse where notices can be posted monthly. If there is a change in the posted schedule a mailing would be required which would cost in the neighborhood of $800. Of course I don't know what the situation is in your community; this may not be a problem.

Board meeting should be scheduled for the same week each month so board members can prepare and organize their personal schedules accordingly. Board members should inform the President of scheduled vacations if this is what is causing absenses. The absent board members should be aware of the importance of this meeting and adjust their personal schedules accordingly. Seems to me the more prudent thing to do would be to hold the meeting if a quorum is present.
GeraldT4
Posts: 1,022
Posted:
KarenS11 - In light of the detail you provided in your follow-up post, I don't commend the President for postponing the meeting. I agree with what I think you are encouraging is that the meeting should occur so long as there is a quorum of Directors/Board Members. Problem is that President may choose to not attend the meeting, thereby leaving only two out of 5 Directors/Board Members. Sounds to me like the President needs to be relieved of his officership and become just a director. Your gov. docs. probably permit the Board to choose who is officer, typically officers (unlike Directors/Board Members) serve at the pleasure of the Board, not by a vote of the owners.
KarenS11 (Florida)
Posts: 148
Posted:
Thanks for the input. To answer some of the questions posed-

I didn't intend to vote by proxie, as I know that isn't allowed. But, although I think the presidnet needs to take a less laisses faire attitude, every member of the board is there for the good of the neighborhood and there are no hidden agendas. That is why if those of us that will not be there share our thoughts, they will be taken into consideration in the decision-making process.

My son is coming off a two week choir tour and their homecoming concert is tomorrow night. I won't be voting via speaker phone, but will probably be totally embarassing him because I'll either be tearing up or waving a lit lighter back and forth in the air- LOL!

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here