RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Currently I am dealing with a case where a prospective buyer approach the Architectural Committee to find out if they bought a house in the subdivision would they be able to build a privacy fence. Similar Architectural questions are becoming more and more frequent. Buyers often are not schooled on proper procedures by their buyer's agent and volunteer homeowners serving on the Architectural Committee often are not aware of proper procedures to follow. Therefore I have provided the following guidelines. Has anyone experienced this? If so, how have you handled it?
1) The HOA should have NO COMMUNICATION with a potential Buyer. Potential buyers are not an owner and may never be. With regards to documents required to be provide by the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act, they are provided to the seller or the sellers broker and status letters are provided to the title companies upon request for a closing. From a legal standpoint, I believe communications with a prospective buyer will place those individuals, the ARC, and the Board in a precarious position.
2) When a potential buyer has questions these should be addressed to their real estate agent, who contacts the seller's agent and receives answers back for the seller's agent after they have conferred with the seller. If there is no buyer's agent then the buyer should go through the seller's agent; and if there is also no seller's agent the buyer deals directly with the seller. Real estate agents for the buyer and the seller should be knowledgeable of and follow these procedures; and should have advise their clients.
3) It is the responsibility of the seller to provide documents and answers to questions to a potential buyer through the above channels.
4) All Architectural requests must come from an owner. The Architectural Committee has no authority to approve a modification request from a non-owner. This can get tricky for the seller who has a potential buyer who needs to know if they buy will the Architectural Committee approve a modification they will want to do. One solution is for the owner to submit a Request To Modify Form explaining an answer is needed to provide information to a potential buyer on whether or not such a request would be approved.
5) If approval of a request would set a precedent the Architectural Committee must first get approval in writing from the Board of Directors.
1) The HOA should have NO COMMUNICATION with a potential Buyer. Potential buyers are not an owner and may never be. With regards to documents required to be provide by the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act, they are provided to the seller or the sellers broker and status letters are provided to the title companies upon request for a closing. From a legal standpoint, I believe communications with a prospective buyer will place those individuals, the ARC, and the Board in a precarious position.
2) When a potential buyer has questions these should be addressed to their real estate agent, who contacts the seller's agent and receives answers back for the seller's agent after they have conferred with the seller. If there is no buyer's agent then the buyer should go through the seller's agent; and if there is also no seller's agent the buyer deals directly with the seller. Real estate agents for the buyer and the seller should be knowledgeable of and follow these procedures; and should have advise their clients.
3) It is the responsibility of the seller to provide documents and answers to questions to a potential buyer through the above channels.
4) All Architectural requests must come from an owner. The Architectural Committee has no authority to approve a modification request from a non-owner. This can get tricky for the seller who has a potential buyer who needs to know if they buy will the Architectural Committee approve a modification they will want to do. One solution is for the owner to submit a Request To Modify Form explaining an answer is needed to provide information to a potential buyer on whether or not such a request would be approved.
5) If approval of a request would set a precedent the Architectural Committee must first get approval in writing from the Board of Directors.