|
|
|
|
|
|
| IHG Insurance (National Insurance Provider) |
| Providing Community Association Insurance for over 25 years: D&O Liability, Crime Products, Umbrella Coverage and Property Manager's Errors & Omissions Liability. |
|
| Reserve Fund Resources (National Reserve Planning Tools) |
| If you’re a BOD Member, Planner, or PM you’ll want our offerings. Many are FREE. Plus, there’s our “Essentials” book, and software to keep your funds healthy. Learn More… |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
|
| Author |
Messages |
|
JackieB
(California)
Posts:99
 |
| 04/22/2008 11:32 AM |
|
nice to meet all of you.
Jackie |
|
|
|
|
MicheleD
(Kentucky)
Posts:1445
|
| 04/22/2008 2:46 PM |
|
Absolutely, Jackie, Nice to meet you too.
And I agree with Sue's previous post.
I do have a few comments about your post just prior to that one, Sue.
(and yes, thanks for keeping the debate so straight-forward! God knows I'm no expert, nor do I admit to having all the facts in this one, I'm just going by what I "think" I know or understand from what's been posted!)
Sue said: " **** I don't know what vista tan looks like, it seems from what was posted Jackie does not either. But, I do know that tan is a lighter shade of brown. So, factually we don't know much about the colors except what is now existing.
{{snip}}
*****This is why I would not give a fine to the brown fence HO. However, I would give the HO time to repaint in compliance to what was determined acceptable. If they do not paint in the reasonable time limit, then fine him."
My replies:
****I don't know what vista tan looks like either, but it might also be closer to a beige, even, since it keeps being referred to as a "light" color.
****I'm still of the position that it's not necessarily that the color is incorrect, but rather that it obviously was not vetted properly, which is what makes it out of compliance. So the fining would be in lieu of them returning it to the original color, if they refuse to do that, until it is returned to the original color, at which point they can then get the proper approvals.
However it appears the board is allowing them the opportunity to get the darker color approved, but it seems they may be either stalling on that or somehow dragging it out -- it seems, based on experience with similar mindsets here, that I think they think they can stall and bluff the board in to just say, "oh. Okay...." and let it go.
But, I hope they can get their colors approved. The thing about colors is, popular and/or trendy ones change and evolve over the years.
You never know, EVERYONE may want a chocolate brown fence next fall!
|
|
|
|
|
BradP
(Kansas)
Posts:1742
|
| 04/23/2008 6:56 AM |
|
****I'm still of the position that it's not necessarily that the color is incorrect, but rather that it obviously was not vetted properly, which is what makes it out of compliance. So the fining would be in lieu of them returning it to the original color, if they refuse to do that, until it is returned to the original color, at which point they can then get the proper approvals.
The reason I asked Jackie what the fine was for before was for this reason. If you are fining them because the color is unapproved I can buy that...if you were fining because they didn't seek approval then I would have an issue because how many other people did it before. that is my parting statement...I will bow out of this conversation |
|
|
|
|
|
| You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
|
ActiveForums 3.6
General Legal Notice: The content of forum messages are from the posting member and have not been reviewed nor endorsed by HOATalk.com. Messages posted by HOATalk or other members are for informational purposes only, are not legal or professional advice and do not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel. HOATalk is not a licensed attorney, CPA, tax advisor, financial advisor or any other licensed professional. HOATalk accepts ads from sponsors but does not verify sponsor qualifications nor endorse/guarantee any sponsor's product or service.
HindmanSanchez Legal Notice: (For messages posted by HindmanSanchez) This message has been prepared by HindmanSanchez for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Members of HOATalk.com should not act on this information without seeking professional counsel. Please do not send us confidential information unless you speak with one of our attorneys and get authorization to send that information to us. If you wish to initiate possible representation, please contact an attorney in our firm. Our attorneys are licensed to practice law in the state of Colorado only.
Legal Notice For Messages Posted by Sponsoring Attorneys: This message has been prepared by the sponsoring attorney for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Readers of HOATalk.com should not act on this information without seeking professional counsel. Please do not send any sponsoring attorney confidential information unless you speak with the sponsoring attorney or an attorney from the sponsoring attorney’s firm and get authorization to send that information to them. If you wish to initiate possible representation, please contact an attorney in the firm of the sponsoring attorney. Sponsoring attorneys that post messages here are licensed to practice law in a specific state or states as indicated in their message signature or sponsor’s profile page. (NOTE: A ‘sponsoring attorney’ is an attorney that is a HOATalk.com official sponsor and is identified as such in the posted message or on our sponsor page.)
|
|