💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

KarenT (Washington)
Posts: 249
Posted:
I would like to know your opinion regarding changes to the CCR's.

Specifically, our recorded CCR's state "each owner shall be obligated to pay assessments made pursuant to this section..... and any unpaid assessments shall bear interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the due date until paid,."

Because there are several homeowners who were continually deliquent, the association wanted to give them an incentive to pay on time. At as our budget at our last annual meeting we voted to change the late fee to a flat $15.00 if paid by the 25th of the month and $25.00 if not paid within the month the dues were owing. Every homeowner was advised of this change in writing, including those who never come to the meetings. The individuals who never come to a meeting are objecting to this now even though they have already paid 2 late fees of $25.00. They have never paid on time,had presented NSF checks and now refuse to pay $125.00 of accrued late fees. They contend that because the Association did not make the changes to the CCR's and file them in the County records we cannot collect this late fee and that we can only collect the 12%.

Any comments are appreciated. Thanks!

DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Karen,
Unless your documents give a specific amount that you can charge for late fees, then your Board has the authority to change those fees to whatever amount that they feel is needed. You gave each owner the new scheduled amount in a mailing and that is all that you are expected to do.

As you well know, delinquent owners usually make the most noise over something that they are the most guilty of. Let them make all of the noise that they want. You are giving them a break by giving them the tiered amount of late fees. What a break for them and yet they squawk about it. I say, pay up in time and this then becomes a mute issue to the late payers.
GeraldT4
Posts: 1,022
Posted:
KarenT - A late fee is not the same as the rate interest accrues on an unpaid assessment. Therefore you aren't changing anything. Also DonnaS is correct with her post. If 12% accrual is not incentive enough, I don't know what is. Delinquent/non-payer must be a more politically correct way of saying deadbeat.

You asked for an opinion regarding changing a cc&r. If you were making a change, say from 12% to 13% my opinion would be to follow the percentage requirements of owners necessary to amend the cc&r's and not change anything on a board level without the owner's vote.
PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
KarenT: Your docs state it clearly..."any unpaid assessments shall bear interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the due date until paid."--12% interest on the actual fee amount from the date due until the fee is paid. The CC&R is a legally recorded document, and, as such, any amendments MUST be made according to the dictates of the document itself--whether the interest rate is mentioned in the Declaration or Bylaws portion.

Your residents are correct, I'm afraid, in that an amendment change to the docs must be brought before the resident membership for a percentage vote to pass; your docs should state clearly the percentage necessary.

SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
And charges back to the homeowner for the NSF should be covered by a policy set by the Board. That has nothing to do with late fees.
KarenT (Washington)
Posts: 249
Posted:
This is a "late fee" and it was voted by and passed a majority vote. We didn't dicuss or vote to make an amendment to the CCR's for "unpaid assessments".
PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
KarenT: You asked for opinions on changes to CCRs...if your association wants to impose another method for handling unpaid assessments, rather than to do what the CC&Rs state to do, then you are not following the official documents.
You can call it a 'rule' or the imposition of a late fee, but IF you are not charging the 12% on unpaid assessments until paid, and prefer to add a 'late fee', you are changing the directed process. This is an amendment change which must be officially treated as such.

DonN (Michigan)
Posts: 357
Posted:
I agree with PaulM. The association is obligated to adhere to the provisions in the CC&Rs — no more and no less. Unless the CC&Rs authorize the board to act otherwise, the requirements can be changed only by amendment of the CC&Rs.

Normally, any amendments to the CC&Rs are not effective until recorded with the Register of Deeds which provides constructive notice to all owners and potential buyers. After recording the amendments, it is important for the association to advise existing owners of the approval and recording of the amendments.

RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
A Board, preferrably with the approval of members present at a meeting of the members of the association, can establish Rules and Regulations (policies and procedures) on delinquent assessments. When they do not conflict with the Declaration of CC&Rs, late charges and other policies and procedures can be established. In fact, in Colorado the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act REQUIRES common interest associations to establish these. It does not require amending the Declaration to establish late charges, fines, costs related to NSF checks, etc. If this is challenged in court the judge will consider first the Declaration and last the Rules & Regs.
PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
RogerB: Would you explain your response in regards to:
- if the CC&R process is NOT being followed pertaining to an interest rate to be accrued on unpaid assessments
- if the CC&R process for an interest rate on unpaid assessments IS BEING followed PLUS a late charge has also been established by the Board

The above shows 2-different scenarios--a late charge NOT conflicting with what the CC&R states, but if it is being used INSTEAD of what the CC&R states then the 'new' process require an amendment?
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By PaulM on 01/08/2008 10:04 AM
RogerB: Would you explain your response in regards to:
- if the CC&R process is NOT being followed pertaining to an interest rate to be accrued on unpaid assessments
- if the CC&R process for an interest rate on unpaid assessments IS BEING followed PLUS a late charge has also been established by the Board

The above shows 2-different scenarios--a late charge NOT conflicting with what the CC&R states, but if it is being used INSTEAD of what the CC&R states then the 'new' process require an amendment?

- If the CC&Rs give a specific interest rate to charge on delinquent accounts that should be followed. If not followed, the Board (or PM when delegated) can be held accountable. However, CC&Rs often state "up to X% interest"; in which case the Board can select 0%. I am not a proponent of charging interest because it is usually so minor it provides no incentive to pay and the time and effort is not justified.

- Following the CC&Rs interest rate schedule does not preclude establishing Rules and Regulations when allowed by the CC&Rs. These Rules and Regulations can include a Collection Policy which can establish late charges, time and cost schedules for various actions, and other critical details. These Rules and Regulations can often be approved by just the Board, but it is better to also get them approved at an association members meeting.
DonN (Michigan)
Posts: 357
Posted:
RogerB describes two situations. The first is that a state law may require the association to have a policy on fees, interest and other charges related to delinquent dues and assessments. But apparently, the Colorado law does not prescribe how such fees, interest and other charges are to be determined.

The best protection for the owners against arbitrary and capricious action of the board of directors is to prescribe the fees, interest and other charges in the CC&Rs. Then the owners are clearly in control. The fees, interest and other charges can only be changed by amendment of the CC&Rs.

Some CC&Rs give the association, or the board, the authority for rules and regulations. Again, the language in the authority must be clear, and should be limited to rules and regulations that are consistent with the provisions in the CC&Rs. This prevents a board from creating an extension or expansion of the provisions in the CC&Rs through issuance of rules and regulations.

Checks and balances are essential to good governance. Open-ended powers to a board is an invitation to abuse — sooner or later.

PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
DonN: ..."The best protection for the owners against arbitrary and capricious action of the board of directors is to prescribe the fees, interest and other charges in the CC&Rs." Thanks, you cleared up the CC&R change nicely!!!

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here