💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

WilliamS1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 113
Posted:
I was wondering how other HOA's seperate and deposit regime fees into special accounts. We have an operational account (61%), roofing (17%), and a reserve account(22%). I am under the impression that we should take the percentage of each based upon full regime fee collections and multiply the percentage as to what actually come in. Is this a correct process or is there another process that anyone has found better.

Thanks
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
William, I presume by regime fees you are referring to assessments. We deposit all assessments into the operating (checking) account. Then funds are transferred to the reserve account based on maintaining liquidity and the annual budgets. A percentage is used by some associations to determine the total annual reserve incoming funds. But we do not use percentages. We start with a long range (20 year) capital improvement plan plus the annual operating and reserve budgets. From these the annual assessment is determined.
JoeW1 (New York)
Posts: 728
Posted:
WilliamS1 - If I understand your post correctly you multiply maintenance fees collected from each paymen by the percentages 61%, 17%, 22%, etc.? Correct? What did you base the overall amount you need transfer each year to cover all reserve replacement items. Many associations have a Transition engineering firm perform a Capital Reserve Replacement Analysis (CRRA) and arrive at an estimated replacement cost (ERC) of all the items the HOA/COA is responsible to replaced (common elements). Then at the Board's discretion or maybe state statute a threshold percentage amount of the ERC is transferred to the reserve account each pay period. Did you have a CRRA performed as a basis for your percentages?
JoeW1 (New York)
Posts: 728
Posted:
WilliamS1 - Some additional points, some HOA/COA Boards also choose to perform a full funding method as opposed to the threshold of the ERC. Meaning say the ERC of the roofs is $900,000.00 and the estimated life-span of the roofs is 20 years. The full funding method divides the ERC by the number of years and transfer that amount to a reserve account to cover that reserve line item each year. Full funding, as defined by GAP Report #24 ("A Complete Guide to Reserve Funding & Reserve Investment Strategies", 4th ed., produced by CAI) tends to result in over-funding if the community is starting with a capital reserve fund balance less than the current depreciation of its common elements, or to result in under-funding if the community is starting with a capital reserve fund balance greater than the current depreciation of its common elements.
WilliamS1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 113
Posted:
I guess I was not to clear. Last year we had a complete reserve study done and they gave us an amount that we should be setting aside per month for the long term reserve. The problem s that some months if we allocate the entire amount of the reserve funds (roof and reserve), we are left with very little in the operational fund. It has been suggested that instead of setting a fixed amount into the reserve accounts, we proportion each account based on the amount of fees that we actually get in per month. Based upon that, the reserve deposits would be higher some months and lower other months. What do you think.

Thanks
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
William, that is the method to use. Monthly budgeting allows for putting more funds into the reserve account(s) some months and little to none other months. It is necessary for liquidity, i.e., maintaining sufficient funds in the operating account.
WilliamS1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 113
Posted:
Thanks everyone and especially RogerB.
JoeW1 (New York)
Posts: 728
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By WilliamS1 on 09/08/2007 10:08 AM
Thanks everyone and especially RogerB.

WilliamS1 - Given that RogerB and I were the only two that took the time to respond to your post, it's an insult that you wouldn't just simply say "thank you for the information". Makes me wonder why I took the time to open up my own Cap. Reserve Analysis and offer you pro-bono information that cost my assoc. thousands of dollars.

DaneC (California)
Posts: 210
Posted:
Roger - I don't quite follow your post. Seems like you are saying that the reserve transfer is not a fixed monthly amount for the year.

They have quite correctly, identified a 39% Reserve, and a 61% Operating requirement, of the overall monthly Assessment, so that his statement that
"some months if we allocate the entire amount of the reserve funds (roof and reserve), we are left with very little in the operational fund" appears to point to an underlying collection problem.
JoeW1 (New York)
Posts: 728
Posted:
DaneC - My read of Roger's post is that as long as the overall transfer to reserves is what it should be at budget year's end, it doesn't matter that the monthly collections vary. My perspective on that kind of budgeting is that the reserve fund will not experience as much earned interest since the balance from month to month with not consistently accumulate.
JoeW1 (New York)
Posts: 728
Posted:
DaneC - Typo correction to last sentence: My read of Roger's post is that as long as the overall transfer to reserves is what it should be at budget year's end, it doesn't matter that the monthly collections vary. My perspective on that kind of budgeting is that the reserve fund will not experience as much earned interest since the balance from month to month will not consistently accumulate.
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DaneC on 09/10/2007 12:48 PM
Roger - I don't quite follow your post. Seems like you are saying that the reserve transfer is not a fixed monthly amount for the year.

That is correct. First of all assessments may be monthly, bi-monthly, quarterly, and annually. The amount which is maintained in the operating account is always maintained to have a sufficient amount to cover the bills, regardless of the schedule for adding to the reserve account. To aid in determining reserve additions we provide a monthly budget for every anticipated income and expense.
DaneC (California)
Posts: 210
Posted:
1)The problem is that some months if we allocate the entire amount of the reserve funds (roof and reserve), we are left with very little in the operational fund.
2)It has been suggested that instead of setting a fixed amount into the reserve accounts, we proportion each account based on the amount of fees that we actually get in per month.

1)I think they are avoiduing the issue, which appears to be a collection problem, and he does say "the problem".

2)When does the reserve transfer get done, after the monthly bills get paid, and there is finally enough left for the reserves? In that type of setting, it usually means that there will be 2 reserve transfers in some months - a definite sign, that collections are not keeping up with due dates, also, he says - "actually get in per month."

Proportioning seems to be an attempt to work around collection delays. (And they are not optimizing their interest earning ability as you pointed out.)
JoeW1 (New York)
Posts: 728
Posted:
DaneC - Points very well taken. IMHO the same amount to Reserves should be transferred each month and if there are shortfalls, the maintenance fees should be increased to avoid them. Many may differ with my opinion and budgeting, oh well.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
JoeW1 do you know what it takes to increase "maintenance fees"? It takes a 2/3rds vote of the homeowner's to AGREE to even talk about the issue and approve the idea to have an increase in either dues or assessments. If the documents allow yearly increases, you have to wait until the beginning of the year for the newly organized board to vote in majority to approve raising the dues to that yearly percentage increase. Yearly increases are typically VERY low like 5% or less. Any more than the allowable yearly percentage increase takes a general membership vote to approve.

I don't know about anyone else on this forum, but I wouldn't appreciate a special assessment or increase in my dues without justification. I am not going to arbitrarily vote in a dues/special assessment even if you tell me that it's for increasing the reserves account. Any increase has to have a specific purpose and finite amount. You can't just say "increase the dues so we have some in reserves". It has to be "We need to put $10K in our reserves by the end of the year and that increase of dues/special assessment will be divided EQUALLY amongst ALL the homeowner's to achieve that".

Our HOA couldn't afford a regular contribution to our reserve fund. It was sporatic at best. However, if I were to setup a HOA budget, savings may be another "liability" I would put in the column. Then adjust the dues collection amounts from there to meet our monthly bills if needed. Quite often it is rob peter to pay paul in a HOA, so designating a savings amount is nearly impossible and keeping to it. Just do the best you can and hope at the end of the year, you have something there!

Former HOA President
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Melissa, Melissa, Melissa, when you make blanket statements like:

Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 09/10/2007 5:31 PM
JoeW1 do you know what it takes to increase "maintenance fees"? It takes a 2/3rds vote of the homeowner's to AGREE to even talk about the issue and approve the idea to have an increase in either dues or assessments. If the documents allow yearly increases, you have to wait until the beginning of the year for the newly organized board to vote in majority to approve raising the dues to that yearly percentage increase. Yearly increases are typically VERY low like 5% or less. Any more than the allowable yearly percentage increase takes a general membership vote to approve.

It makes me want to pull what little bit of hair I have left out. Just because it takes 2/3rds in the association you don't even live in; it DOES NOT MEAN it is required in every association in the country. It comes down to what is required by each HOA's CC&R's and governing STATE LAW (if any). You make these statements like they are being handed down from the mountain and new posters don't know that it is not necessarily the truth.

"Our HOA couldn't afford a regular contribution to our reserve fund. It was sporatic at best. However, if I were to setup a HOA budget, savings may be another "liability" I would put in the column. Then adjust the dues collection amounts from there to meet our monthly bills if needed. Quite often it is rob peter to pay paul in a HOA, so designating a savings amount is nearly impossible and keeping to it. Just do the best you can and hope at the end of the year, you have something there!"

This is without a doubt one of the most asinine statements you have posted in a while. Unless your association is full of people who can come up with a large amount of money in a short time to cover capital repairs to the common elements, then every association needs a reserve study and fund (savings) to pay for repairs/replacements down the line. One state (Ohio) even requires that the HOA put at least 10% of its maintenance fund into reserves and to fully fund the reserves. The only way around that requirement is if the majority of the association votes to allow special assessments. This vote MUST be taken each year.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
JoeW1 (New York)
Posts: 728
Posted:
GlenL - I am totally with you on this. There is no HOA Commandment for all associations stating "Though Shall not Increase transfers to reserves or Assess without a 2/3rd's Vote of Owners".

MellissaP1 - You understand what GlenL and myself are saying here correct? You've read this reply? Please do not keep going on and on as if the rules in your former HOA apply to everyone?

As for your statement, "designating a savings amount is nearly impossible and keeping to it." It may be impossible for you and your former HOA, however it is not impossible for mine, especially when it comes to reserves. And if the best you can do is "hope" there is something in the savings account at the end of the year, than you my dear are not fit to be a fiduciary.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
JoeW1 I am NOT the one applying my rules or putting my poor attitude about my HOA onto anyone like you. Sorry, but your posts are so full of negativity and assumptions that I don't even like replying to your posts. Most of the really good posters on here that I would take advice from do indicate that each HOA is different. I can only post what I know from my experience and don't pretend it is someone else's. You should do the same. Because right now a majority of your posts indicates members should be at "War" or "Battle" with their HOA. I don't know about anyone else on here, but I would rather "Work with" and "Live in peace" with my neighbors.

So I would stop knocking everyone else on this website for posting their opinions. Respect that this is a website full of opinion and advice and NOT attitude. Take the "emotions" out of the advice and maybe you will be a bit more informational than confrontational.

Former HOA President
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JoeW1 on 09/10/2007 1:35 PM
My read of Roger's post is that as long as the overall transfer to reserves is what it should be at budget year's end, it doesn't matter that the monthly collections vary. My perspective on that kind of budgeting is that the reserve fund will not experience as much earned interest since the balance from month to month will not consistently accumulate.

Your read of my post is correct Joe. However, let me try to change your perspective on "that kind of budgeting is that the reserve fund will not experience as much earned interest since the balance from month to month will not consistently accumulate."
When assessments are due at the beginning of a quarter or beginning of each year when you place the budgeted reserve funds into an investment account on a monthly basis rather than when received there will be less earned interest.
JoeW1 (New York)
Posts: 728
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 09/11/2007 6:48 AM
JoeW1 I am NOT the one applying my rules or putting my poor attitude about my HOA onto anyone like you. Sorry, but your posts are so full of negativity and assumptions that I don't even like replying to your posts. Most of the really good posters on here that I would take advice from do indicate that each HOA is different. I can only post what I know from my experience and don't pretend it is someone else's. You should do the same. Because right now a majority of your posts indicates members should be at "War" or "Battle" with their HOA. I don't know about anyone else on here, but I would rather "Work with" and "Live in peace" with my neighbors.

So I would stop knocking everyone else on this website for posting their opinions. Respect that this is a website full of opinion and advice and NOT attitude. Take the "emotions" out of the advice and maybe you will be a bit more informational than confrontational.

MelissaP1 To quote a fellow member to your post on this topic regarding reserves, "It makes me want to pull what little bit of hair I have left out. Just because it takes 2/3rds in the association you don't even live in; it DOES NOT MEAN it is required in every association in the country."

You posted as follows as if it applies to all HOA's, and I quote, "JoeW1 do you know what it takes to increase "maintenance fees"? It takes a 2/3rds vote of the homeowner's to AGREE to even talk about the issue and approve the idea to have an increase in either dues or assessments."

Based upon your post quoted above you are most certainly apply the rules in your former HOA onto me. And that is what is extremely frustrating and I once again am trying to get you to recognize it. If you are going to post something from your experience, say so with the caveat that it is from your experience. As for you comment that my posts indicate members should be at war or battle with the HOA, you are incorrect. However, members should recognize their role in the process of checks and balances and be savvy to their importance to accomplish adherence to the process that governs associations. Sometimes, unfortunately it does take a neighborly coalition.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here