Quote:
Posted By TimM11 on 03/18/2019 11:05 AM
Posted By CathyA3 on 03/18/2019 8:12 AM
(As an aside, when my association was looking into enacting a rental restriction, our lawyer recommended not having numerical limit because owners will be treated differently, since approval to rent your home depends on timing and actions of others. Restrictions of this sort are more vulnerable to court challenges.)
At the risk of going off on a tangent, what was the alternative to a numerical limit that they recommended?
Their recommendations resulted from a review of court cases around the country. Here is what they felt would be most likely to stand up in court:
* First degree relatives (parent, child, sibling) of the unit owner should not be counted as tenants.
* All owners should be entitled to a one-time exemption for up to two years. For example, if you must relocate and can't sell your home, you can rent it for up to two years. However, if the tenant moves out after a year, you can't lease it to a new tenant - you've used your exemption. (Lawyer felt that we shouldn't call it a "hardship" exemption, otherwise we'd be arguing over whether individual cases qualified.)
* Currently leased units should be grandfathered in until the unit is sold.
Even though this is a pretty loose rental cap, the amendment did not pass (over 25% of unit owners were not in favor). Owners may regret this if investors start to target the community. Our CC&Rs already prohibit short-term rentals (less than 6 months), as well as hotel or corporate rentals, and we enforce that. I check the airbnb web site regularly.