ChrisW4 (Georgia)
Posts: 16
Posts: 16
Posted:
All,
My HOA is in the "debate process" of enacting rental restrictions in our community. We recently had two owners (out of 20) move out and rent their houses within a couple months of each other, which pushes us over that 30% line that I keep hearing about that makes it harder to get a mortgage.
The one question that's been raised is whether or not the limits on mortgages if the community is more than 30% rentals applies to only condominiums, or to fee-simple homes governed by an HOA as well. While our units are connected and the HOA covers exterior maintenance in addition to common areas, we are legally not a condominium, so it's possible that our concerns here might not be well-founded if this rule is for condos only.
What we'd like to do is not put a hard limit on rentals, but to require that anyone renting their unit have been a resident for a minimum interval (one or two years) before being able to do so. The primary goal is to keep investors out, while keeping in mind the needs of people who may need to relocate but don't want to sell yet - this was the case with the two recent units in question. But if it turns out we're bound by the 30% rule we really don't have much choice but to be more restrictive.
Can anyone let me know one way or the other what Freddie Mac's rule actually is? Thanks!
My HOA is in the "debate process" of enacting rental restrictions in our community. We recently had two owners (out of 20) move out and rent their houses within a couple months of each other, which pushes us over that 30% line that I keep hearing about that makes it harder to get a mortgage.
The one question that's been raised is whether or not the limits on mortgages if the community is more than 30% rentals applies to only condominiums, or to fee-simple homes governed by an HOA as well. While our units are connected and the HOA covers exterior maintenance in addition to common areas, we are legally not a condominium, so it's possible that our concerns here might not be well-founded if this rule is for condos only.
What we'd like to do is not put a hard limit on rentals, but to require that anyone renting their unit have been a resident for a minimum interval (one or two years) before being able to do so. The primary goal is to keep investors out, while keeping in mind the needs of people who may need to relocate but don't want to sell yet - this was the case with the two recent units in question. But if it turns out we're bound by the 30% rule we really don't have much choice but to be more restrictive.
Can anyone let me know one way or the other what Freddie Mac's rule actually is? Thanks!