๐Ÿ’ฌ Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account โ†’

โšก Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

JM10 (California)
Posts: 503
Posted:
We just found out that the Board of Directors has been sending out newsletters to everyone but us and decisions were made without our knowledge. Each month we have asked when the meetings were, but were told there were none. They had a meeting in January, but we found out after the meeting. When we found out about the December meeting, it was "canceled."

They say they don't have to send us newsletters.

This is after we won a small claims court case for non-production of documents.

The board has the rest of the complex convinced we are picking on them for minor things, but we aren't allowed to attend meetings and that's what really started things up.

Any advice?
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
JM

Generally all owners have the right to attend BOD Meetings. Now do understand that right might be to attend as an observer only as in not allowed to comment/speak unless there is an open comment session.

If as you say, all others are on the Email list and know when the meetings are why does not anyone care to inform you?

JM10 (California)
Posts: 503
Posted:
Here's how bad it is.

First meeting with this board, when the location of the meeting moved, they slammed the door on my husband's face. He was the treasurer.

He noted that this was a violation of the Common Interest Open Meeting Act. Instead of apologizing, the board never addressed his claim/complaint. They said at first it was an executive session, but in the minutes it came out it wasn't.

Those meeting minutes arrived after the next meeting (past the 30 days they were supposed to be made available). We had asked in person, via email and even posted signs asking when the meeting was.

The next meeting, wasn't properly announced, but my husband found out and they told him he could not speak or he would be ejected. They also publicly derided us, claiming the meeting date was announced in the newsletter which is wasn't--at least in ours.

We took them to small claims court so we could get documents. We won the case and agreed to mediation for the remainder.

Since then, we haven't received any newsletters. We asked about meetings and were told there were none. But we just learned at the general meeting that they did have newsletters, but didn't feel they were required to send them to us. (that would be in October, November and December).

Of course, they also didn't feel they were required to notify us of the December meeting. When we found out and asked where it was the meeting was "canceled." But it seems the board did meet because they took action. We didn't find out about the January meeting until after it occurred. The board didn't notify us in writing as required.

We have a lawyer and are supposed to go into mediation as well as small claims court again. I just wondered if other people had experienced this selective distribution of information.

JM10 (California)
Posts: 503
Posted:
One board director claims we have taken money for our personal gain from the HOA. Actually, the current board blames my husband for all the problems with the previous board. He was not the president or the secretary.

No one wanted to get involved when my husband had the door slammed in his face although they used to come knocking at our door whenever they had problems before.

I'd say people don't want to get involved. We only have 10 units.

BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
To your point about newsletters, to my knowledge there is no requirement to send newsletters to anyone...however, if they send to some they should send to all.

As to the issues you are facing, after taking them to court and winning it isn't a surprise they are acting this way. If I were in your shoes I would ask for a meeting with just the board and have what I refer to as a come to Jesus meeting. Cards need to be layed on the table, issues thrown out and resolved and at the end of the day someone needs to say lets quit acting like a bunch of babies, we want to attend meetings we have a vested interest in our community, what will it take to get there.

While court is an option it isn't going to make things any better.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BradP on 01/31/2012 9:19 AM
To your point about newsletters, to my knowledge there is no requirement to send newsletters to anyone...however, if they send to some they should send to all.

As to the issues you are facing, after taking them to court and winning it isn't a surprise they are acting this way. If I were in your shoes I would ask for a meeting with just the board and have what I refer to as a come to Jesus meeting. Cards need to be layed on the table, issues thrown out and resolved and at the end of the day someone needs to say lets quit acting like a bunch of babies, we want to attend meetings we have a vested interest in our community, what will it take to get there.

While court is an option it isn't going to make things any better.

Sound advice.
JM10 (California)
Posts: 503
Posted:
Hi, Brad...

We asked for this. In California, if a member asks for a meeting on a claim notice, the board doesn't have a right to refuse.

But they refused anyway. They won't put the topic on the agenda. They won't meet to confer. They ridiculed us, saying we didn't know what we were talking about and now (post court date) they claim we're bringing up an obscure law.

They were cautioned by the judge in small claims court about how they are acting.

Who knows. We might get the same judge again.

BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
Did you ask for a meeting outside of a board meeting? to me this is a lets meet at a neutral location, grab a drink and figure out why the heck things aren't working out.

There are three types of boards in my opinion:

1. Cave to anything board, you throw the mere thought of a lawsuit at them and they will do anything.
2. Dig in our heels and tell you where to put it board.
3. The board that plays it by the book.

you unfortunately have #2, you need to find out what you ideally want and then figure out the best way to get there.
JM10 (California)
Posts: 503
Posted:
You're funny Brad.

We'd prefer #3.

It's stupid that we pay an assessment and can't even attend meetings. I think the board was hoping we were like #1 and threatened us with fines (for violations which they couldn't find a code for).

We asked for a meeting. They declined and ignored us until they got served.

Our next court date is in February. We also should be meeting with a professional mediator.

JM10 (California)
Posts: 503
Posted:
You're funny Brad.

We'd prefer #3.

It's stupid that we pay an assessment and can't even attend meetings. I think the board was hoping we were like #1 and threatened us with fines (for violations which they couldn't find a code for).

We asked for a meeting. They declined and ignored us until they got served.

Our next court date is in February. We also should be meeting with a professional mediator.

BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
have you approached them about an off the record meeting to clear the air?
JM10 (California)
Posts: 503
Posted:
They won't tell us who the president, treasurer or secretary is. The lead person seriously hates us. Can't even speak to us politely. Their hate (the couple) is incomprehensible.

The board is taking us to court for spurious claims that makes our lawyer laugh.

So yes, we've asked. We asked the other two board members, but then learned they were lying to us about not knowing the date of the next meeting. Then we asked for mediation. That was refused. So finally, we took them to court. Now not only do we not know when meetings are, we are not given the newsletter. They won't admit they are wrong.

How pathetic is it that they won't even give us the newsletter?

JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,569
Posted:
about as pathetic as whining to a bunch of strangers

lol

JM10 (California)
Posts: 503
Posted:
Asking for advice from other people who may have experienced similar situations isn't whining. Doing nothing and complaining is whining.

I just read an old thread about a personal vendetta. That's pretty much what we have here.
BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnB26 on 01/31/2012 11:58 AM
about as pathetic as whining to a bunch of strangers

lol


John...not sure why the need to do that...nothing wrong with asking for advice.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
While I am JOHNC46 and no need for me to defend JOHNB26, I do think many come out here not really asking for advice (as in here is the issue and I am asking for advice) but telling us how they have already handled it and why they did so as in looking for agreement not advice.

Also some are complainers/whiners by nature. They would complain splitting a $100 million lottery with another ticket holder....LOL
DoloresM2 (California)
Posts: 60
Posted:
What a tacky response.
JM10 (California)
Posts: 503
Posted:
Yes, I used to sit next to a whiner at work and it was depressing. That's what earphones are for. ;)

I just wondered if other people had this problem and what they suggested. We did, as someone else suggested, attempt to handle it informally (just apologize and invite us to the next meeting) and that didn't happen.

The newsletter was the latest addition. By preventing us from seeing the newsletter, we also were kept from being involved in the nomination/election process.

We were looking for a legal angle (aside from arbitrary and capricious rules).

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DoloresM2 on 01/31/2012 2:42 PM
What a tacky response.

DOL

Sorry you feel that way, but I believe if you read and think about many of the posts out here they are from the "problem child". Especially after mutlti posts beating the same dead horse when others suggest you stop.

If there are multi owners and all (as most claim) are against you is it paranoia?

I am not paranoid as I know I am right.......LOL

BonnieG1 (Nebraska)
Posts: 1,186
Posted:
Reading the problems other associations have make the problems we have look like a Sunday School picnic.

We don't have newsletters, but we post the regular Board meeting on the calender by the entrance.

We don't post special Board meetings, but do leave the door open. We have been accused of having "secret meetings". We have had a few executive sessions dealing with personnel problems.
JM10 (California)
Posts: 503
Posted:
I've heard that this happens in some condos and HOAs and wish we were one of them.

We only wanted to go to meetings (and avoid legal liability).

GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
JM, unfortunately when dealing with recalcitrant people you sometimes have to keep beating them over the head (figuratively not literally) to bring them into compliance. Davis-Stirling applies whether you have 10 units or 10,000 units and as a member you have a right to attend the meetings and the Board must post an agenda 4 days before the meeting giving the date and time of the meeting and if they are using to newsletter to do this, then yes they must include you.

I whole heartily endorse Brad's option but if they are unwilling to meet, your only option may be the courts. You can also distribute your own newsletter with your side of the matter citing the relevant sections of DS and ask your neighbors what the Board has to hide. You might also inform the Board that their D&O insurance won't protect them if they knowingly & willfully violate the law.

Civil Code ยง1363.05. Open Meeting Act.

(a) This section shall be known and may be cited as the Common Interest Development Open Meeting Act.

(b) Any member of the association may attend meetings of the board of directors of the association, except when the board adjourns to, or meets solely in, executive session to consider litigation, matters relating to the formation of contracts with third parties, member discipline, personnel matters, or to meet with a member, upon the member's request, regarding the member's payment of assessments, as specified in Section 1367 or 1367.1. The board of directors of the association shall meet in executive session, if requested by a member who may be subject to a fine, penalty, or other form of discipline, and the member shall be entitled to attend the executive session. As specified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (k), a member of the association shall be entitled to attend a teleconference meeting or the portion of a teleconference meeting that is open to members, and that meeting or portion of the meeting shall be audible to the members in a location specified in the notice of the meeting.

(f) Unless the bylaws provide for a longer period of notice, members shall be given notice of the time and place of a meeting as defined in subdivision (k), except for an emergency meeting or a meeting that will be held solely in executive session, at least four days prior to the meeting. Except for an emergency meeting, members shall be given notice of the time and place of a meeting that will be held solely in executive session at least two days prior to the meeting. Notice shall be given by posting the notice in a prominent place or places within the common area and by mail to any owner who had requested notification of board meetings by mail, at the address requested by the owner. Notice may also be given by mail, by delivery of the notice to each unit in the development, by newsletter or similar means of communication, or, with the consent of the member, by electronic means. The notice shall contain the agenda for the meeting.


Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
JM10 (California)
Posts: 503
Posted:
Thank you Glen. My husband is really upset. It's like being the only kid in the class not invited to a party where they spend time laughing at you.

I found one mention of newsletters in the Davis Stirling Act and that's in reference to elections.

๐ŸŽฏ You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • โœ“ Ask follow-up questions
  • โœ“ Share your experience
  • โœ“ Get expert advice
  • โœ“ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account โ†’

โšก Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here