💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

MikeS1
Posts: 521
Posted:
Has anyone else been going through this? Any ideas? Our FHA certification was to have expired in Dec/2010, then FHA extended until May 2011, but in spite of all the warnings and letters, our COA board and PM has yet to get our Condo's recertified by FHA. The board says that they pass the 7 vetting questions, but they seem just be dinking around. First that said that the attorney, and auditor were handling it, then they fired the attorney and auditor, then they hired another attorner and another auditor. Then they said that the new attorney is handling the approval process and application. Then this week, we hear that the attorney says.. "oh no, this is only done by specilists" and he said that he could not do it. Meanwhile Convential money is tight and the days of 5% down.. are gone. FHA enables 3% down, higher qualifying ratios and the loans can go up to like $729,725. FHA loans are huge now and now having approval knocks out 30% of the market.

The cost of paying a specialist to process the paperwork for FHA is about three dollars a door in our community, so I can't see why they would refuse to recertify. We purchased the home twenty years ago when it was approved for FHA and we feel that they should maintain the certification.

The board has an obligation to preserve the value of the community, protect the interests of the owners in addition to maintaining and enhancing the value of the assets of the commmunity. Their failure to act with Due Diligence in this matter and I feel that they are negligent at this point. I'm wondering how many COAs are opening themselves up to litigation after homeowners take huge losses on the sale of their home.

FHA loans represent almost half of all new loans and in some areas account for 75 percent or more of first-time home purchases. Condos for sale in non-FHA approved associations may prove extremely difficult to sell and will generally sell at lower prices as a great number of potential buyers will be excluded. FHA loans require a low down payment (3.5%) and less-than-perfect credit. Unlike other mortgages, FHA loans are fully assumable. When a seller with an FHA loan sells his or her property, the loan and its financing terms (interest rate) can be transferred to the new buyer, which will certainly make a property more valuable and easier to sell in times of rising interest rates.

With the elimination of spot approval in February 2010, it is now an absolute requirement that an entire condominium development have FHA approval in order for any FHA loans to be funded. Prior to this date, there was little incentive for a condominium association to obtain FHA approval since HUD allowed "spot approvals," a mechanism which allowed a buyer to use an FHA loan for the purchase of a unit within an unapproved association, as long as no more than ten percent of the units located in the association had FHA-insured mortgages.

Technically, FHA approval lasts for only two years but until recently this rule was never really enforced. FHA loans were permitted in condo developments that obtained their approval as far back as the early '70s.

But due to the huge increase in FHA's market share, HUD and FHA toughened standards in many areas and set up timetables for taking fresh looks at projects before sanctioning additional unit financings.

FHA officials issued notices during the past year to lenders, condo-management companies and consulting firms, warning them that condo developments approved by FHA before October 2008 would have to submit information required for renewed approval by Dec. 7, 2010 or lose eligibility for FHA financing.

SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
I wonder if something else is preventing the certification from going through. As I understand it, certification could be denied if less than 51% of the condos are owner-occupied, 15% or more of owners are 30 days or more delinquent in paying assessments, and some other things.

I've also heard there's been a lot of talk about amending these requirements because so many condos are having trouble meeting the requirements. Maybe you could ask your bank's mortgage department to see what's going on - perhaps the board is waiting for proposed amendments to go through so they can reapply. There should also be information on the process online - search FHA certification and see what comes up.

Whatever it is, the board does need to tell homeowners what they're doing. If the attorney can't handle the certification, they need to find someone who can (the association's bank might have some ideas)

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
HeleneN (Connecticut)
Posts: 84
Posted:
Also, keep in mind that FHA requires that 10% of your operating budget should be going into reserves!
MikeS1
Posts: 521
Posted:
Helene - They say "not" that it meets the standards, but I think that they just don't know which forms to use and exactly how to file. FHA is very picky. The 7 vetting questions are as follows.

1. Is the association involved in litigation, other than foreclosure proceedings involving unit owners? If so, HUD will need to review this issue at the time of approval.

2. Is there currently an active special assessment, collection or associated work, or is a special assessment planned within the next 2 fiscal years? If so, HUD will need to review this issue at the time of approval.

3. Does your current fiscal year's budget reflect a minimum of 10% of the standard assessment value being deposited into reserves?

4. Does any unit owner own more than a single unit? No entity may own more than 10% of the units within any association. The developer of a condominium is exempt from this calculation IF AND ONLY IF the turnover to the association has not taken place.

5. How many units are in your association and how many of them are more than 30 days behind on HOA dues? Must not exceed 15% of units.

6. What is the current owner occupancy percentage (non- renters) ? Must be greater than 50%.

7. Does your association maintain Fidelity Bonding equal to no less than the sum three (3) months' standard assessments PLUS the sum of the current balances of all reserve accounts, combined
EllieD (Vermont)
Posts: 446
Posted:
MikeS1

I suggest that you research a bit further. I am not sure that a Condominium MUST be pre certified.

The last time I looked into this subject, if I remember correctly - the only requirement was that if someone was attempting to secure a FHA backed Mortgage – then at that time the Association had to provide answers to those questions, when requested.

The reason for “certification” was so that the Condos could be advertised as being certified.

If you are a large number of Condominiums, then maybe yes a good idea. Also I seem to remember something about it costing a fair of money to do so – as it was not a “do it yourself” thing, but had to be done by a “professional”.

This past year we had had a couple of Condo Units change hands – and we just supplied the answers plus the back-up paper work, when requested by the person trying to get FHA backed mortgage approval, and/or when the Bank or Lending Institution requested the information.

So long as you are able to provide the answers that you (Association, Management Company) meet the requirements – which are basically as you listed - then all should be OK.

However, if your Association falls short – then there is work to be done to correct any shortcoming.

LaurenM (Texas)
Posts: 20
Posted:
Hi, Mike -

We've been going through the same situation. We are a small, 33 unit condo association located in Texas. I am a Board Director, and Secretary/Treasurer. What I have gathered so far for us is that at one time we were FHA approved, but sometime last year 2011 a prospective buyer attempted to get FHA financing to purchase and was told our condo complex was not certified. Our property manager never informed the Board and just went ahead and tried researching it himself and ellicited some assistance from a mortgage company that he knows. A year has gone by, we are still not certified and now after reviewing the property manager folder of information on the issue, our board feels that this is too complicated to try to attempt on our own without hiring some help to do the process for us. Also, from those notes, we were made aware of the requirement by FHA to have 10% allocated to reserves in our yearly budget, as Helen said. We were not allocating that, but our Board just approved to do that for our 2012 budget.

Our former property manager resigned in September and as our Board interviewed new management companies we asked them about this issue of how to get FHA certification. All said they did not get involved in this and recommended that we hire a company that specializes in this issue.

So, bottom line, is that in my yearly report as Secretary/Treasurer, I will be recommending to our new Board that they contract with a company specializing in FHA certification so that we can get this accomplished for 2012. I'm glad I read your posts and replies to it because I will now note the 7 veted questions that Helen spelled out in her reply to our new Board.

I will watch this post chain to see if you have any new developments on your end for your association.
MikeS1
Posts: 521
Posted:
Ellie - Just google Condo FHA certification or go to the HUD site and look up FHA certification - It's all over the web.
MikeS1
Posts: 521
Posted:
Thanks Lauren - I found one good specialist in CA and 3 more in PA if you want the info. Just email me if so. If you have any specialist or any other info, let me know. Email me. Tks.
MikeS1
Posts: 521
Posted:
Every since 2010, everyone was notified and reminded that the old blanket approval was going to expire.

Without FHA, you're losing 50% of the market. It's going to be expensive to recert, but I would think that it's a must situation. The banks are not doing 5% down loans any longer, qualifying ratios are very tight 28/33 as opposed to 33/38 on FHA loans. FHA is not longer just for low end loans. The go up to like 725K. The feds gave all that bail out money to the banks and now the banks won't lend it out. Note: There is company in CA that charges around $1,200, (plus $300 attorney fee) and he doesn't charge the $1200 if FHA declines to approve the application. Then after that, the COA must recert on a streamline basis every two years and it's only $600 to recert, once the initial cert is done.

The board has an obligation to preserve the value of the community, protect the interests of the owners in addition to maintaining and enhancing the value of the assets of the commmunity. Their failure to act with Due Diligence in this matter and I feel that they are negligent at this point. I'm wondering how many COAs are opening themselves up to litigation after homeowners take huge losses on the sale of their home because the Board is too lazy to et this done. Right now we don't see Due Dilegence. What I see is Negligence per se.
MikeS1
Posts: 521
Posted:
Every since 2010, everyone was notified and reminded that the old blanket approval was going to expire.

Without FHA, you're losing 50% of the market. It's going to be expensive to recert, but I would think that it's a must situation. The banks are not doing 5% down loans any longer, qualifying ratios are very tight 28/33 as opposed to 33/38 on FHA loans. FHA is not longer just for low end loans. The go up to like 725K. The feds gave all that bail out money to the banks and now the banks won't lend it out. Note: There is company in CA that charges around $1,200, (plus $300 attorney fee) and he doesn't charge the $1200 if FHA declines to approve the application. Then after that, the COA must recert on a streamline basis every two years and it's only $600 to recert, once the initial cert is done.

The board has an obligation to preserve the value of the community, protect the interests of the owners in addition to maintaining and enhancing the value of the assets of the commmunity. Their failure to act with Due Diligence in this matter and I feel that they are negligent at this point. I'm wondering how many COAs are opening themselves up to litigation after homeowners take huge losses on the sale of their home because the Board is too lazy to et this done. Right now we don't see Due Dilegence. What I see is Negligence per se.
EllieD (Vermont)
Posts: 446
Posted:
MikeS1,

I agree there is a lot of information “out on the web” which is why I commented as I did. I wanted to make sure that you had found the latest Mortgagee Letter effective August 29, 2011 – and some of the “reaction to it”.

For anyone interested here are a couple of links to that latest letter:

http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=11-22ml.pdf

http://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/hudclips/letters/mortgagee/files/09-46bml.pdf

Also, there is quite a bit of written/published commentary “out there”. For example the below is a quote from this newsletter:

http://www.reesbroome.com/community/August_2011.pdf

“The applicant is required to make 3 certifications regarding the project:

1) The project meets all state and local condominium laws and FHA approval requirements;

2) To the best of the submitter’s knowledge, the information and statements contained in the application are true and correct; and

3) The submitter has no knowledge of circumstances of conditions that might have an adverse affect on the project or cause a mortgage secured by a unit in the project to become delinquent, such as defects in construction, substantial disputes or dissatisfaction among unit owners about the operation of the project of the association, etc. The submitter must continually notify HUD of any material information that was submitted is no longer true or correct.

This third certification is new and very onerous. Not only does the applicant have to certify the validity of the information being submitted, he or she also must certify that there are no owner “disputes or dissatisfaction” about the operation or management of the Association.”
----------------------------------------------------------

For anyone interested in the topic, here are two more links to “published commentary” re the FHA’s Mortgagee Letter 2011-22 on the subject of certification to this latest FHA letter: (as being different from certification to the earlier FHA’s Letters) – WHICH MIGHT MAKE SOMEONE “THINK TWICE”.

http://www.kmklawyers.com/Articles/10-21-11-New-rules-for-FHA-financing-hold-pitfalls-for-condominium.shtml

http://www.meeb.com/meeb-legal-alerts/fha%E2%80%99s-revised-condominium-guidance-solves-some-problems-but-creates-many-more/

And while I was typing this reply to post I received this newsletter – and on this very topic of certification.

http://www.cohoalaw.com/community-association-news-denver-post-covers-impact-of-fha-certification-on-condo-market.html

MikeS1
Posts: 521
Posted:
Good stuff, Thanks Ellie
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Might be the Devil's Advocate here, but notice the main references are from legal firms throwing up the 30 years in prison and $1M fines as in hire us, we can handle it.
EllieD (Vermont)
Posts: 446
Posted:
JohnC46

I am not sure how to interpret your post - but –

The “fine” information cited is from the FHA “CONDOMINIUM PROJECT APPROVAL and PROCESSING GUIDE” - link below.

http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=11-22mlguide.pdf

The paragraph below is found on page 53: (and also the bottom of the forms on pages 69 and 70).

4.5 False Certifications
Title 18 U.S.C. 1014, provides in part that whoever knowingly and willfully makes or uses a document containing any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, in any matter in the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States, shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned for not more than 30 years or both. In addition, violation of this or other requirements may result in administrative action, including Civil Money Penalties, suspension, debarment, or withdrawal of approval and / or civil action for penalties and damages suffered by the Department.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Ellie

While I am not advocating lying, are not the FHA questions realtively straight forward, simple, and answerable by most any "intelligent" BOD without the need of "lawyering up"?

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Ellie

I hate that one cannot edit their posts here and I do apologize for the sounding demeaning "intelligent" remark.....but my question/post stands...LOL
MikeS1
Posts: 521
Posted:
John - It's not just a matter or answering questions. Your documentation that goes with the application must be spot on. Some of these land records cannot be copies of what you already have in hand. You must go to land records at the county and request certified copies.

What Documents Must a Condominium Association Submit to HUD toObtain Certification?
In order to qualify for FHA financing, HUD has developed a list of required documents each association must submit before certification will be granted. The
attachment to FHA Mortgagee Letter 2009-46B (attached hereto), contains a chart that shows what documents are required, depending on an association’s status as an existing condominium, proposed condominium, a condominium under construction or condominium conversions. The requisite documents for most condominium associations include the following:
1. The condominium’s recorded plat.
2. The association’s governing documents (Declaration, Bylaws, and Articles of Incorporation).
3. Recorded site plans for the project.
4. A plan or evidence of transfer of control of the condominium to unit owners.
5. A proposed or actual budget.
6. Any existing management agreement.
7. Any applicable FEMA flood map.
8. An analysis of any outstanding or pending litigation.
9. An analysis of any pending special assessment.
EllieD (Vermont)
Posts: 446
Posted:
JohnC46,

What you just wrote is the point I was trying to make when I first responded. (We are self-managed, established, have low turnover, and have never been “pre Certified”).

Yes, a knowledgeable, informed, Board Member should be able to answer the questions - the “factual” ones. And we have done just that in the past, when asked to by various lending institutions, when we had someone trying to obtain a mortgage, or refinance. But that was BEFORE.

As I understand, there is BEFORE the latest Mortgagee Letter 2011-22 effective August 29, 2011 and AFTER.

But now AFTER, I cannot comment from experience, as we have not been asked to fill out any paperwork recently. All I know is what I have read.

As “the attorneys, lawyers” keeps pointing out, it is the NEW information requested on the form on page 69, subject to the “$1,000,000 fine statement” that is causing problems.

How does one certify to Number 3 which reads:

“3. The submitter has no knowledge of circumstances or conditions that might have an adverse effect on the project or cause a mortgage secured by a unit in the project to become delinquent (including but not limited to: defects in construction; substantial disputes or dissatisfaction among unit owners about the operation of the project or the owners association; and disputes concerning unit owners, rights privileges, and obligations). The submitter understands and agrees that the submitter is under a continuing obligation to inform HUD if any material information compiled for the review and acceptance of this project is no longer true and correct.”

Here is a link to a pdf of that page:

http://www.cohoalaw.com/uploads/file/Project%20Certification.pdf

As MikeS1 just pointed out there is a lot of information requested - but for us - all available to the Board and in our files and/or obtainable.

And yes, it is time consuming and ”work” to provide all that information. But, we are a small association, under 100 Units, established, self managed, and fortunately we have low turnover. I understand how it could be problematic for a larger association.
MikeS1
Posts: 521
Posted:
So Ellie - Is your condo association currently approved for FHA? If so, when did you reapply and when was it approved.
If you're not sure, you can look up your condo Assoc on this hud site and it will tell you whether or not you are approved.
https://entp.hud.gov/idapp/html/condlook.cfm
EllieD (Vermont)
Posts: 446
Posted:
Mike, No we are not on the list and never have been. But, I did just check to make sure.

However, I believe we have been approved for FHA mortgages over the past few years or so, even though not on the list. Before this latest Mortgagee Letter we answered questions and provided required backup documents, etc. to the lender - but at the time when a mortgage or refinance was pending. That seemed to work.

When I first replied my thought was, it might not be “as bad” as you were thinking – that FHA backed mortgages could be secured even though your approved status had expired - so long as your Condominiums met all the current requirements needed to get approval.

Obviously we are in very different areas of the country.

Our experience may not translate. We have very little turn over, and have not had to “work with” a lender since Mortgagee Letter 2011-22.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Our HOA (standalone patio homes) is not on that list either, but I do know we have had two homes sold with FHA financing within the last 6 months. As the developer still controls our HOA I expect he has been answering any FHA questions/filling out any forms and/or his lawyer is thus it appears there are no issues.

MikeS1
Posts: 521
Posted:
John and Ellie - There are no more FHA spot approvals. Unless the community has FHA approval, you will NOT be able to do FHA loans. This is a huge issue -
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Mike

I need to check but to the best of my recall, one of our units sold was FHA financed less then 60 days ago so as you say, when did/do the changes take effect?

Thanks

MikeS1
Posts: 521
Posted:
John - If you want to check the status of your community, use this link.
https://entp.hud.gov/idapp/html/condo1.cfm

Most communities lost their cert in May 2010. Spot approvals were discontinued in Feb 2010.
MikeS1
Posts: 521
Posted:
John - If you want to check the status of your community, use this link.
https://entp.hud.gov/idapp/html/condo1.cfm

Most communities lost their cert in May 2010. Spot approvals were discontinued in Feb 2010.
FredB4 (Ohio)
Posts: 375
Posted:

Mike,
We are a condo and went through a similar thing, although initally our board voted to not get approved for the list because of the strict guidelines, cost of applying and low requirements for loans. FHA also gurantees the mortgage payment but not the monthly HOA fees.

We found out that with rentals, FHA backed loans were almost the only option for our condos , so we applied and were accepted even though our certification had expired. That wasn't a problem because all associations now have to be reviewed from scratch anyway to be certified and then you will need to re-apply every two years.

I assume from your posting that you are a condo. Do you allow rentals ? That can have a big affect on loans.

It is not terribly difficult to get approved at the moment because so many condos weren't qualifying, they have waived many of their restrictions.Those waivers may or may not be extended. Which likely means you might be approved this year but not when you re-apply in two years. The requirements that you generally see are only a small portion of the restrictions that the FHA actually has in place.

The trade magazine "Inside Mortgage FInance" puts the figure for loans backed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the FHA at 90%. All use the FHA guidelines.
If you have more than 20% rentals, government backed loans will be almost the only option for buyers or for owners who want to refinance.

If you have rentals here is a link to the restrictions that the FHA normally places on those. That waiver is due to expire this March.

http://www.caionline.org/govt/news/Political%20HeadsUp%20Public%20Document%20Library/FHA%20Issues%20Waiver%20on%20Leasing%20Restrictions.pdf

I highly recommend calling your local bank loan officer and make an appointment to go in and talk to them about what is happening in your area. I went to see 3 different ones from three major banks but they all said the same thing so probably one will do. They generally are very open to doing this because selling mortgages is a big part of their business.
EllieD (Vermont)
Posts: 446
Posted:
FredB4,

As a point of interest – do you know whether you “started your approval process” before or after the Mortgagee Letter 2011-22 effective August 29, 2011.
FredB4 (Ohio)
Posts: 375
Posted:
Ellie,
I belive it was started just before but it was very close to that date and I'm not certain when they actually sent in the application for approval so it is possible that it was actually after that date when the application was actually receiverd by HUD. We got our approval at the beginning of Oct 2011.

I hadn't seen that letter before but doesn't it apply to single family homes in HOA's as opposed COA's ?
You seem to be well informed on this topic so am wondering why you asked that question.

Do you have an opinion on why they keep granting "temporary" waivers so more associations can qualify and not just permanently changing the
requirements ? What do you think will happen in two years when we have to re-apply ?
EllieD (Vermont)
Posts: 446
Posted:
FredB4,

I have been following this topic for awhile – however, all I really know is what I have read – and in my previous posts, I have shared sites where I found information.

As to “why not just permanently change the requirements” – apparently this is “not easy” - see the last two links at the end of this post, to CAI (Community Associations Institute) letters to the Federal Housing Commission.

FYI - Mortgagee Letter 2011-22 applies to Condominiums. It starts off:

“Date: June 30, 2011
To: All Approved Mortgagees
Mortgagee Letter 2011-22

Subject: Condominium Approval Process for Single Family Housing – Consolidation and Update of Approval Requirements

Purpose: This Mortgagee Letter (ML) and the attached Condominium Project Approval and Processing Guide (Guide) consolidate and update the requirements and procedures that constitute the Condominium Approval Process. This ML and the Guide clarify, expand, consolidate and update existing guidance, and replaces MLs 2009-46 a, 2009-46 b and 2011-03.”

Here is a link:

http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=11-22ml.pdf

Another source which points out the problems with 2011-22 is a “real” letter dated July 25, 2011 written from CAI to the Federal Housing Administration, and a later letter dated October 12, 2011 – links below:

http://www.caionline.org/govt/news/Political%20HeadsUp%20Public%20Document%20Library/FHA%20Letter%202011-22.pdf

http://www.caionline.org/govt/news/Political%20HeadsUp%20Public%20Document%20Library/CAI_to_Galante%20(waiver%20request)--10-12-11.pdf
FredB4 (Ohio)
Posts: 375
Posted:
Ellie,
Thanks for the links. They are very helpful. The whole thing is a nightmare and keeps changing.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here