💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

JamesB15 (Florida)
Posts: 87
Posted:
Happy Holidays and thanks to all for your contributions. Now let me tell you I am a HOA troublemaker. I have gotten myself elected to a board that hates me so I will finally be able to add a different kind of insanity. I have had 4 records requests and 2 more by my lawyer since April. WE are on our third pres since May. The board referenced my attempts to see the records in the minutes two times. I told you last year that the BOD put a fee on the swimming pool that was free for 38 years.No vote no nothing. We are a HOA in Florida since 1972. Our covanents say the association can charge reasonable admission fees for recreational facilities situated on the common area. They also say we have the right of access and enjoyment of all common areas. We are locked out of the pool if we don't pay up, swim or not even though our dues covers it. The covanents say dues and special assessments must be equal for all members. Then I told your they are taking me to presuit mediation for a supposed covanent violation. They had 10 days to approve or disapprove. Didn't happen so I went ahead and brought in a unit. After seeing records today there have been only 6 archetectural applications in the last 3 years in a park that has units. I had 30 addresses that I was looking for applications. They then had a closed board only meeting. During the meeting they said they were going to sue me and play hardball since my attorney told them we could make them pay the $500. The point was I had to try to get them to see I was serious. I am and investor and I need to know the rules. They referenced the 10 day Arch Committee time limit in the minutes a year earlier so they were aware. At the records inspection the president said they were not suing me, only taking me to mediation. HELLO are you serious. I could go on with the horassment. This BOD is using dues to make me spend money and then walk away. They take cash at the pool and throw it away. On the application the Arch Committee had recommended passage. Any ideas?
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,047
Posted:
James,

You gave a nice history of your past posts. However, I don't understand what it is you are asking advice for. Is it about the pending litigation, the application process, the fact that you are now on the board, or ???
JamesB15 (Florida)
Posts: 87
Posted:
Hi Tim No one likes throwing money down the drain because someone makes them. If they don't go past mediation can I take this forward to recover my money? I won't take an attorney to mediation, too expensive. My attorney says the same things over and again. Every time his mouth opens I see $ signs.They know they are wrong they are willfully acting in an unreasonable manner beacause it is not their money. They should be held responsible. How?

MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
You do realize suing your HOA is suing yourself and your neighbors? So it is THEIR money and yours they are using to take this to meditiation. Not all mediation is created equal. Some do NOT allow you take the matter to court ONLY mediation. The expense occurred in this process is to pay for the mediator and mediation process. No lawyer is necessary. Mediation is typically faster, less expensive, and results are compromised.

The HOA is set up to resolve it's own issues if you just follow the rules. Do you have a copy of the CC&R's? They are considered PUBLIC documents and available at the local county courthouse. No one is required to give you a copy except for you. I'd suggest reading the CC&R's and finding out how the HOA is designed on resolving such issues. It's better than depending on paid legal advice when it's an in-house issue.

We charge a clubhouse rental fee even though our HOA dues cover the maintenance of the clubhouse. There is also a 100 dollar damage deposit check required as well. So I don't see a problem with your HOA charging for pool usage. A HOA is ONLY funded by it's owners for it's owners. Not all owners want to contribute to the pool if they don't have any interest in it. Only makes sense they may make up rules to benefit by those who do want to use the pool.

Former HOA President
JamesB15 (Florida)
Posts: 87
Posted:
Happy New Year Melissa I am fimiliar with your views on sueing for rights that have been trampled on by commando boards. If when you purchased your unit that was the policy fine but if the charge was added after you were told that it was included that is wrong. If you rent your clubhouse to non members that is another story. This group decided to charge,no vote or imput.Of course there is no opposition because most people don't use these facilities and are happy to let others pay. Last year they did not didn't raise dues optional 3% so this year they decide they want extra cash so they add last year and raise dues 6%. I went to a lawyer after 4 months of them hiding the records. I brought in a unit last year and the guidelines were in the minutes. What about a BOD that knows they are wrong and forcing a member to waste money to defend themselves of false charges? Why didn't you change the rule if you wanted to charge? Why do boards spend so much of our money suing us or asking lawyers questions that are already in the covanents? The board is suing me and your stuck me wanting to ask how to recover my costs. I respectfully don't understand your point. Maybe you should read the laws governing non profit corporations.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,047
Posted:
James,

I suspect that the Association will have an attorney acting on their behalf during the mediation. If you are not going to have an attorney with you, be sure to bring all the documentation you have and make sure it's organized and you have copies available (just as if you were going to court).

If I understand your issue correctly, your documents specify that if the Association doesn't respond to a request within 10 days then the request is automatically approved. You sent your Architectural committee a request, waited the allotted time and when no answer arrived, you made your change. Now the Association is of the opinion that you are in violation for making that change.

Expecting that I am of the proper understanding of the issue, in order for you to have a slam dunk on defending yourself you will need to prove when the Association received your request. Do you have a return receipt showing it was received or communication indicating that they received your request? If you don't, neither side can really claim a victory and you may need to bring your records request into play (if allowed) to show that the Association has dirty hands when it comes to responding to requests. If you need to go this route, you may be better in bringing an attorney with you.

As for recouping legal fees, this should be settled at the mediation vs. going into court. Have you counter sued for them? If not, there may or may not be a time frame you are allowed to do this. Your attorney will be better qualified to assist you here.

Hope this helps,

Tim
.
JamesB15 (Florida)
Posts: 87
Posted:
Tim,
Thank you again. You have it right. I have a slam duck. I verbally advised them, sent pictures and address,filed archetectural application(committee recommended approval)waited and sent emails,provided all documentation, lawyer sent letter, waited 12 days and went forward.After I got records had exact case where board president advised the board they had ten days to accept or deny allowing unit. Still after all that they take me to mediation. They made no attempt to discuss or reconsile. The lawyer said I could not counter if I don't answer the request within 20 days and attend mediation. 720.3035 (4)states that if they knowingly and willingly infringe on my rights they are responsible for any costs,resonable damages and attorney fees. Why would someone not be personally responsible? It seems the law would provide a counter against a nut that is suing people with dues when he knows he is wrong.
CarolF (Florida)
Posts: 435
Posted:
Would you please explain this statement:
"After seeing records today there have been only 6 archetectural applications in the last 3 years in a park that has units."
Are you in a mobile home community?
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
I am confused, too, James. You wrote that you "brought in" a unit. Was that a mobile home? And bringing one in requires Archt. Comm. approval? And did you leave the number of "units" out accidentally?
JamesB15 (Florida)
Posts: 87
Posted:
Sorry Carol. Yes it is a mobile home park with a HOA There are around 240 owner owned lots. We fall under Fl.chapter 720. The board has official records spread out in their homes with few kept at the office. I have been trying to inspect them since April. I three vacant lotsI want to put mobile homes on and they will be more than two years old. The covanents say units must be no more than 2 years old or get board approval. I have a number of units and the board does not like investors. They play these kind of games costing everyone $.

DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

James,

Please refresh my memory. Why do you fall under 720? Because you own the lots?
JamesB15 (Florida)
Posts: 87
Posted:
Yes Donna I guess that is why. Our corporation was was set up in 1972.
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

James,

In 1972, there was no Statutes 720 so you were set up as a 617 not for profit corp. The 720 Statutes were adopted in the year 2000. Did your corp ever file changes to their Articles of Inc. to convert to 720? In a vast number of associations, they just started using 617. Tho they are very similar, 720 specifically addresses HOA's where 617 is for all non profits and is different in election procedures and quorum requirements than is 720.
JamesB15 (Florida)
Posts: 87
Posted:
Donna we are a non profit corporation that falls under 720. That's all I know. We have a large pool,clubhose, storage compound,ad boat ramp and dock. There are 245 privately owned lots and around 140 units.(aka mobile homes)We have been to arbitration uder 720. Bringing in a mobile home is supposed to be approved by the board. The archt.is supposed to check it out and recommend or not. The board has 10 days to respond, if no answer it is considered approved. I waited 2 weeks and tried to check status. On July 23 my 10 days were up. I brought the unit in a few days later. Four months later on November 15 I was notified of presuit mediation. The minutes show that the board was upset about the records request. They have not kept official records as required by law and I have made waves about the illegal pool fee. Last year our dues were not raised as we do not need the money so this year we add last year's 3% and raise 6%and we cannot have a discussion. In August the board held an illegal board only meeting to discuss the records requests and trailer issues. They kept minutes.(figure that one out) Even though they had 2 certified records request they denied me access. They said" we can sue him and play hardball" and it's in the minutes! There are many more negative references to me using my name in the minutes. In December I was elected to the board and this should be interesting. The money I have spent on an attorney to defend myself against this kind of horrassment should not be covered by D&O insurance.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,047
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JamesB15 on 01/03/2012 1:09 PM

In August the board held an illegal board only meeting to discuss the records requests and trailer issues. They kept minutes.(figure that one out)

If they thought that the records request might lead to litigation then your board may have had the right to meet in executive session due to pending litigation. Minutes are to be kept of all meetings. However, for executive sessions, they typically are not released without a court order. Count yourself lucky on getting a copy.

It should be noted that the proper way to hold an executive session is to start with an open meeting, enter into executive session for xyz reason, then return from executive session back into an open meeting and hold any votes required. This way, there are no minutes of the executive session - as no action is taken in executive session. The minutes of the open meeting would show the actions taken and document the fact that an executive session occurred.

Quote:
Posted By JamesB15 on 01/03/2012 1:09 PM

The money I have spent on an attorney to defend myself against this kind of harassment should not be covered by D&O insurance.

Since the action was initiated prior to being elected tot he Board, D&O insurance would not cover.

If the action was initiated while you were on the board, D&O insurance typically wouldn't cover as most policies don't cover disputes between board members.

PeterD3 (Florida)
Posts: 708
Posted:
The notion the BoD could use the excuse of 'thought' this or that, to conduct a meeting in executive session is ludicrous. Either there is PENDING litigation or not.

Under Florida Law even such meetings [which would pass the muster of "executive session"] would require 48 hrs. notice to the owners/members regardless of their right to attend.
JamesB15 (Florida)
Posts: 87
Posted:
What you say makes sense but I don't think it works in Florida. 720.303 an attorney needs to be there to close the meeting. I have been asking to see the records for months. There were 2 refernces to this in the minutes before this. I started off trying to see the records about the illegal pool fee and ended up with a "we'll teach you" lawsuit.

I did not mean the D&O insurance should pay my costs. I meant it should not pay their's. Their own staements show a total disreguard for my rights. The knowingly and willfully impaired my rights(720.3034) They could not possibly believe they have a leg to stand on. Why should members have to pay these fees when they were done as punishment. They had three weeks. This mobile home is nicer than 90% of the park. Imagine for a minute that it is even more blatant than I have told you what would you do? I was on the archt. committee for two years when I was on the board before. I know the ccr's. According to 720 they could be responsible for damages,fee, costs. So what. It isn't that easy. Going to see lawyers is not what it's cracked up to be. If we were on eqal ground, I mean if they had to use their owm money they would not be doing this. By the way I got the copy of the minutes from one on their employees.

Because of all our lawsuits we have had a high deductable. Last year it was 10,000 now it is $5,000. Would the insurance company look at suit before it goes to mediation and possibly tell them they might be on their own?
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,047
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JamesB15 on 01/03/2012 5:07 PM
Would the insurance company look at suit before it goes to mediation and possibly tell them they might be on their own?

If the Insurance company is aware that the Board knew that they were breaking the law, then the insurance company might say that they will not cover this claim. If that happens, then the Association will need to cover litigation costs by using current funds or implementing a special assessment. Either way, the members pay for the bad decisions made by the Board.

Tim

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here