Posted:
Hopefully, the homeowner provided details on what he or she wants to place on the patio. For example, if it's a storage shed, ask about dimensions (height width, etc), colors, materials (e.g. vinyl), who will build the thing, proposed dates of construction start and finish (after the Board approves, of course), etc. We always encourage homeowners to provide color illustrations of their proposed changes.
Finding out who will build this thing is important because if it's something that requires a city permit, the owner should be hiring someone who has the proper credentials (performance bond, license, etc.) We have a situation in our community right now where a previous homeowner had a rubber roof installed on her roof - it appears she got her son to do the work and he didn't do it correctly. The homeowner's since moved and two owners later, the new one has found lots of water damage (that owner #3 never fixed) and wants the Association to help pay for the repairs
(Why did he ask the Board to pay? Trust me, it's a LONG story that we're just now starting to figure out since all of this happened before the current board took office - some of us didn't even live here at the time)
Anyway, if you have design standards, you could compare them to the proposal and if you have concerns, discuss them with the homeowner - he or she could come up with alternatives for the board to consider. Once you approve the work, be sure your approval dictates that the owner is responsible for all maintenance and repairs of the item and this responsibility will be transferred to the next homeowner. Lots of people move into HOAs and get a nastygram about something the previous owner put in without permission and they rarely tell the new owner that he/she will now be responsible - instead the new owner has to take care of it at his/her expense and go after the previous owner or risk fines by the board.
Oh, and make sure the homeowner doesn't drag out the construction - Before he joined the board, our secretary put in an application for an ACR(we call our architechural change request)and it was approved, with the understanding the work would be done within 30 days. It took six months and when he put in another ACR for something else, I asked why the current project wasn't fixed and all he said was "I was working two or three jobs." I then asked why he didn't advise the board of the delay - he didn't have an answer to that, but then again, it was something we should have asked about when the first deadline expired. Lesson learned on both sides - he finished both projects within 30 days and we changed our procedures to check up on the area 30 days after we approve the request.
If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius