RogerM1 (Colorado)
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Posted:
H.B. 09-1359):
"The executive board may not ... elect members of the executive board ..."
This clearly states that the board can't vote during elections, no?
If a popular board member is up for re-election against an 'otherwise unpopular owner' who is running for the board, if proxies are distributed with board members' names or the board president's name - and most indifferent homeowners just fill in whatever name is on the proxy, ie the board president - then that means that the board (or the board president) can "steer" his/her proxies to getting the popular board member re-elected, while the 'otherwise unknown unpopular owner' is screwed. Am I understanding this correctly??
But HB 09-1359 clearly states that the board can't elect members of the board.
I think it's wrong, and clearly illegal, for a board member to be assigned proxy privelages by indifferent homeowners - am I wrong on this???
Because I understand that the Colorado non-profit statue (I'm sorry, I don't know the technical law designate) contradicts HB 09-1359. So what gives??
Rog
"The executive board may not ... elect members of the executive board ..."
This clearly states that the board can't vote during elections, no?
If a popular board member is up for re-election against an 'otherwise unpopular owner' who is running for the board, if proxies are distributed with board members' names or the board president's name - and most indifferent homeowners just fill in whatever name is on the proxy, ie the board president - then that means that the board (or the board president) can "steer" his/her proxies to getting the popular board member re-elected, while the 'otherwise unknown unpopular owner' is screwed. Am I understanding this correctly??
But HB 09-1359 clearly states that the board can't elect members of the board.
I think it's wrong, and clearly illegal, for a board member to be assigned proxy privelages by indifferent homeowners - am I wrong on this???
Because I understand that the Colorado non-profit statue (I'm sorry, I don't know the technical law designate) contradicts HB 09-1359. So what gives??
Rog